Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOP
I fully understand that. My reply to UCANSEE2 was in the reference he/she made that the tape could have been addressed to Bush 41, not Bush 43.

Post #1507 by UCANSEE

1,649 posted on 10/27/2004 12:17:25 PM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (Skerry talks and out comes nothing but stupid words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1634 | View Replies ]


To: Arrowhead1952

I was just expressing my general thoughts and your post was at the bottom. I really was not referring to your post. Sorry


1,656 posted on 10/27/2004 12:20:12 PM PDT by GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1649 | View Replies ]

To: Arrowhead1952; GOP
Yes. I am trying to get the panickers to slow down a minute. ABC "had a copy", and the word HOLDS really meant "HAD A COPY". They DID NOT WITHHOLD this tape from the CIA/FBI/HS. Help me get this to the other posters, DRUDGE's IMPLICATION is FALSE.

Otherwise, we are being made fools of.

1,670 posted on 10/27/2004 12:24:18 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1649 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson