Thanks for this post. I like Andrew Sullivan, and he makes some good points. It is telling how a lot of the posters here have not made any arguments against Sullivan except that he is gay.
Any good points he might make are far outweighed by the damage Kerry could do to this nation as he turns it over to international rule. His history, as well as the words coming out of his mouth, are just too damning.
It is telling how a lot of the posters here have not made any arguments against Sullivan except that he is gay.
Actually what is telling here is that Sullivan's arguements are suspectbecause he is rationalizing his betrayal of his supposed prinicpals over one basically trival civil issue, Gay Marrage
No, he doesn't.
That's why he's treated so disdainfully.
If you'd like to defend any of his "good points", feel free to do so instead of being snide.
I only scanned Sullivan's article and found numerous factual errors and extremely weak arguments.
Those who claim Sullivan only opposes Bush because he of the gay marriage issue might well be right.
Thank you!