To: digger48
I heard that...right after of Dennis had the nerve to say the Washington Times was a biased source....they can dish it out but they sure don't like to take it, do they?!!
30 posted on
10/25/2004 6:32:58 PM PDT by
Kylie_04
To: Kylie_04
of Dennis = old Dennis. Brain/fingers disconnect.
40 posted on
10/25/2004 6:34:10 PM PDT by
Kylie_04
To: cyncooper
If you are out there, you can say "I told you so" --- I deserve it. Thanks again for your help last night!
58 posted on
10/25/2004 6:36:27 PM PDT by
Txsleuth
To: Kylie_04
I heard that...right after of Dennis had the nerve to say the Washington Times was a biased source....they can dish it out but they sure don't like to take it, do they?!!
It's amazing how they do that time and time again:
Everything that goes FOR the Dims is accurate, and
Everything that goes AGAINST them is biased.
What frustrates me is that the general uninformed public largely buys into it. Example: I was talking to a swing voter at work the other week about the swiftvets, and he vomits up the Dim party line ("Oh, they've been discredited. They were part of Bush's campaign. You can't believe them..." etc.).
The Republicans need to copy a page out of that playbook, because it obviously works.
To: Kylie_04
Personally, I'd be much happier if the WashTimes wasn't owned by Reverend Sun Moon, who is, there is no other way to put this, a whacko.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson