Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wideawake
Is there a difference between socialism and communism?According to K. Marx and his followers "socialism" is a transitional stage to a true "communism".

Communism will be a final glorification of the doctrine, thanks to revolution of "working" class and when achieved there will be no private property, no money in circulation, Everybody will receive "according to his needs", and everybody will be required to contribute "according to his means".

Worldwide commies never reached this Utopian nirvana neither they claim they achieved it but they did not give it up either.
However they changed and camouflaged the terms and tactics, now socialism will be universally achieved by imposing Globalization and Global Government, and communist nirvana will be a Global Village.
Sounds familiar?

30 posted on 10/25/2004 3:04:00 PM PDT by Anticommie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Anticommie
Worldwide commies never reached this Utopian nirvana ...but they did not give it up either. However they changed and camouflaged the terms and tactics, now socialism will be universally achieved by imposing Globalization and Global Government, and communist nirvana will be a Global Village. Sounds familiar?

That's the precise tactic being used on both us and the Europeans. The EU consists of an unelected non-representative "government" in Brussels that hands down edicts that tell Brits how much beer they can produce, what kinds of beans the Dutch can export, etc. -- all for "the common good." Oh yes, they say they need a European Army too.

Meanwhile, the United Nations (designed by American Communist Alger Hiss to suit the goals of Stalin) now presumes to establish global rule. Its aim is to make sovereign nations like us subservient to a World Court, Agenda 21, global taxes and treaties like Kyoto that have the effect of inflicting severe economic damage. The intent is to forcibly redistribute the world's wealth from the first to the third world. And who has designs on becoming head of the U.N.? Maybe to establish a World Government like he learned about at Oxford as a Fulbright scholar? With a Democrat President it'll be a cinch even it if's not his wife.

Bush has his flaws, but with Justice Rehnquist ill and Supreme Court appointments coming up there's absolutely no other choice.

39 posted on 10/25/2004 3:35:26 PM PDT by Bernard Marx (Don't make the mistake of interpreting my Civility as Servility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson