To the liberals eternal shame.
This isn't really their "surprise" is it? It seems rather tame for the N.Y. Times, they must have a series of follow-ups. It's hard to believe that there are a lot of undecideds who actually will vote at this point anyway.
Could someone please explain to me why this is a "story?"
I thought most of the IEDs were simply artillery shells rigged to blow; are IEDs made from these explosives any more deadly?
This looks like nothing more that a crudely concocted hit piece by a desperate editorial staff at the NYSlimes.