To: GoBucks2002
"
The Dispatch also strongly opposed the invasion of Iraq, contending the case had not been made that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction or posed an imminent threat to this nation.
![](http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2004-10/847274/saddamwtcpainting.jpg)
Oh well, I will take the endorsment anyway.
To: No Blue States
Majors in OHIO say BUSH!!! THIS IS GREAT!!!!!!
To: No Blue States
What is that picture? Where from?
6 posted on
10/24/2004 8:17:28 AM PDT by
MrChips
(ARD)
To: No Blue States; BenLurkin
I'd love to be a fly on the wall in the metro/political beat offices of these newspapers. The Disgrace was allowing anti-Bush references into sports, weather, film reviews, cooking reviews, and local news reporting. The Ink-wire was just as bad. Both employ anti-Bush cartoonists and run Donnesbury in the comic pages.
As I said after the Indiana game yesterday, "it may not be pretty, but I'll take it."
To: No Blue States
BUMP to your post. I've been saying for a long time now that the picture that appeared in the NY Post after the troops went into Iraq has been ignored -- even by the Bush team. If that doesn't look like a gloating Saddam taking credit for the attack, I don't know what does. Of course, it doesn't prove anything, but the fact that he had the mural done so soon after the 9/11 attack speaks volumes, IMO.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson