[Miss Marple]

Well, what a nice article to read. Nothing like poking the Russian Bear with a stick, is there?

Let's pretend that an article similar to this was written in Russia about the US.

A dominant North America would exert influence throughout the region. It is therefore better to break up the United States into several smaller entities which then would move closer to the Russian model.

I am sure Americans would not take kindly to that, and I am certain Russians take a dim view of this article.

And while I am on the topic, why is it that the democrats say that they are better at diplomacy, when all they do is go around the world insulting everyone with bossy advice and contempt for other countries' contribution? The democrats are amateurs and lunatics when it comes to foreign affairs.

[Destro]

And while I am on the topic, why is it that the democrats say that they are better at diplomacy, when all they do is go around the world insulting everyone with bossy advice and contempt for other countries' contribution? The democrats are amateurs and lunatics when it comes to foreign affairs.

Which is why I posted this. The Democrats want to start off where they left off in the 1990s in regards to the Balkans and Russia - and China.

[headsonpikes]

“And while I am on the topic, why is it that the democrats say that they are better at diplomacy, when all they do is go around the world insulting everyone with bossy advice and contempt for other countries’ contribution? The democrats are amateurs and lunatics when it comes to foreign affairs.”

The Democrats are the party of Wilson and FDR, who respectively were the architects of the dissolution of Austria, thus making possible a Hitler, and the imposition of a United Nations Org., making possible the Third World chaos of the last half century.

Democrats are amateurs and lunatics, yes, but there most dangerous attribute is their idealism.