well, Bush hasnt been talking about him at all...Kerry has been saying he wasnt killed or captured. Bush can claim operational/national security...he couldnt tell til it was safe yada yadya. Kerry has been overtly lying if it's true.
Maybe thats what Bush whispered to Kerry after the third debate...we're on his tail??? Also, the WND article about the 9/11 commissioner saying we know where he is...it would all fit!
Wouldn't it be funny if Iran ratted Kerry out after their donation was noticed just recently?
After all, Kerry from out of nowhere started up with that darned weird direct-to-Iran statement in the 2nd debate about giving them nuclear fuel. Wonder if that was a nod to them 'message received', and an underhanded method to continue "private" foreign policy.
Don't get me wrong, I think that Iran has the capability and general wish to destroy Israel & the US in a heartbeat. They can generally not be trusted at all.
But - What if Kerry's behaviour revolts even them?
Just would kind of underscore the statement earlier this week from some official in Iran saying that Bush was trustworthy at least. (and that was downright "Twilight Zone" to read)