No casualties? White House disputes Robertson comment

CNN ^ | October 20, 2004

[danamco]

Pat chose to go on CNN.



CNN = fair and balanced???

Remember how CNN sold our Sadam Husseins two son-in-law by their silence according to Mr. Jordans admittance so they could have a "news" presence in Iraq!
If you want the real truth, yes be my gust and gobble up what they have to say!!
Not to talk about Mr. Peter? Arnets shenanigans at CNN!!!

[Soul Seeker]

Look, I know CNN's reputation. Pat knows their reputation too.

HE chose to go on CNN to address the remarks in spite of it.

If YOU choose to believe the quotations from Pat are not accurate, PROVE it. Others that have watched the show have verified it was said and transcripts have done the same.

You are contending that:

a) There is no film footage of Pat that was viewed by millions stating what has been alleged here.

b) There are no transcripts of his words

You are wrong.

Pat could clear this up if he didn't really aledge Bush told him there would be no casualties. He has his own show to use as a pulpit. If he is being unfairly accused, go find his denial of the allegation and prove everyone wrong.

[PeoplesRep_of_LA]

I think he is getting close to falling under the "false prophets" category.

Oh, he's well past that. I made excuses in the past for this egomaniac, boy is my face red. Never again.