And if this was the New York Post scorning Michael Moore-on, we would hear all of the Rats crying about violations of the 1st amendment freedom of speech...they can give it, but they can't take it!
1 posted on
10/19/2004 5:36:20 AM PDT by
Mich0127
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
To: jmstein7; RightRules; MeekOneGOP; Peach; onyx; backhoe; Mia T; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; ...
2 posted on
10/19/2004 5:37:18 AM PDT by
Mich0127
(The Democratic Maxim: All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others)
To: Mich0127
the Rats crying about violations of the 1st amendment freedom of speechWhen the rats do it, it's freedom of speech. When our side does it...it's hate speech.
3 posted on
10/19/2004 5:39:05 AM PDT by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: Mich0127
So, I guess Common Cause, et al,will be going after CBS for airing partisan political programming designed to effect the outcome of an election....oh, yes, a story that was COMPLETELY FALSE?
4 posted on
10/19/2004 5:39:35 AM PDT by
atomicpossum
(If there are two Americas, John Edwards isn't qualified to lead either of them.©)
To: Mich0127
And if people watch Sinclair the advertisers will be there.
5 posted on
10/19/2004 5:39:55 AM PDT by
ScaniaBoy
(Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
To: Mich0127
THE NEW YORK TIMES, all the irrelevent Liberal news fit to print....
NO ONE cares what they say anymore.. they are beyond a joke....its hilarious to see them be such hypocrites...
7 posted on
10/19/2004 5:41:09 AM PDT by
ArmyBratCutie
("Four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:soap, ballot, jury, ammo in this order!")
To: Mich0127
If David D. Smith, the CEO of Sinclair Broadcasting, knows what's good for him, he'll forget about airing a documentary critical of Democratic presidential contender Sen. John Kerry.AIR THE DOCUMENTARY!
To: Mich0127
"The public airwaves should not be used by television executives to promote their partisan political agenda," Common Cause President Chellie Pingree told reporters in a telephone press conference. "This action crosses a line." Then we need total reform is the current broadcast networks.
10 posted on
10/19/2004 5:42:13 AM PDT by
briant
To: Mich0127
"The public airwaves should not be used by television executives to promote their partisan political agenda,"
I heard somewhere that Kerry is proud of his record. So what's the problem...
11 posted on
10/19/2004 5:42:29 AM PDT by
babygene
(Viable after 87 trimesters)
To: Mich0127
Whatever revenue Sinclair loses with leftist advertisers it will gain from conservative sponsors.
Kinda like the Left attacking Passion of The Christ.It really did not hurt Gibson's bottom line.
12 posted on
10/19/2004 5:43:20 AM PDT by
Reaganez
To: MistyCA
In case you have not seen!
To: Mich0127
"I've decided I don't want to advertise on them," Adam Lee, the president of Lee Auto Malls, which owns 10 auto dealerships in Portland, Maine Yet another public service by Sinclair: identifying advertisers who are on the wrong side of the issue.
To: Mich0127
I guess character still doesn't matter to these critics of Sinclair. It's interesting how the Bush DWI was OK to air last minute in 2000, because it showed that maybe Bush had something in his past to hide...but, something as minor as Kerry's treason and giving aid and comfort to the enemy in 1971, shouldn't be considered in 2004.
15 posted on
10/19/2004 5:45:21 AM PDT by
borisbob69
(Old shade is better than new shade!)
To: Mich0127
It's not about getting those licenses revoked, however it's about employing a typical left-wing legal tactic: "Such challenges almost never result in lost licenses, but they often result in heavy legal costs for the station having to defend them," said the Times. This is MSM blowhard-ese. "Heavy legal costs" do not occur until there is a HUGE number of critical comments filed at the station, or with the FCC. Typical Olde York Times misinformation, this.
To: Mich0127
New Yrok Times definitions:
If it's anti-American, anti-Christian, anti-family, anti-liberty, and/or anti-President Bush,then it's newsworthy.
If it's anti-Kerry, then it's politically charged propaganda, that must never be mentioned, and anyone who promotes it is evil and must be flayed!!!
Mark
19 posted on
10/19/2004 5:48:12 AM PDT by
MarkL
(Power currupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. But it rocks absolutely, too!)
To: Mich0127
In the words of Phil Knight, "Just Air it!"
21 posted on
10/19/2004 5:49:51 AM PDT by
Hawk44
To: Mich0127
SBGI is 6.49. Hitting its lows and from its charts looks like a usual trend, low in January.
I think I'll buy this morning.
22 posted on
10/19/2004 5:50:00 AM PDT by
OpusatFR
(Let me repeat this: the web means never having to swill leftist garbage again. Got it?)
To: Mich0127
"......."I've decided I don't want to advertise on them," Adam Lee, the president of Lee Auto Malls, which owns 10 auto dealerships in Portland, Maine,....."
The decent people of Portland, Maine should decide not to purchase a car from him wheen they need to buy one.
I know that I have bought my last union made vehicle and when I buy clothes, tools or anything else I look for anything on the tag that reads "Union Made". If I see those words, I put it back.
23 posted on
10/19/2004 5:50:32 AM PDT by
sport
To: Mich0127
I am no stock Guru - but it looks to me like SBGI is a "BUY". There is a lot of emotional negatives priced into the price @ ~$6.50/share. It's had good earnings - beating the estimates by a good chunck.
I am going to buy some today - also, maybe the continued negative press will drive the price lower over the next few days......
25 posted on
10/19/2004 5:51:04 AM PDT by
rface
(Ashland, Missouri - monthly donor /bad speller)
To: Mich0127
"The public airwaves should not be used by television executives to promote their partisan political agenda," Common Cause President Chellie Pingree told reporters in a telephone press conference. "This action crosses a line."
Anyone have a quote from this PinHead when Dan Rather used forged documents from a known Bush hater to smear a Sitting President?
I didn't think so. They were probably to busy masterbating in jubilation over the "quality" of the investigation.
27 posted on
10/19/2004 5:54:09 AM PDT by
Area51
(Diapers and Politicians need to be changed-For the same reason)
To: Mich0127
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson