Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chemist_Geek
There isn't any in the bill; that rhetoric is in there just to get people riled up.

And some President in the (near?) future might think: why have a National ID if we don't make use of it...

60 posted on 10/18/2004 12:57:14 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Deport 'em all; let Fox sort 'em out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
You're making the assumption that such an expansion is inevitable. It's not, despite historical evidence. If you're going to argue against national I.D. based on the slippery slope fallacy, then you're going to have to prove that such provisions are going to be put into effect.
68 posted on 10/18/2004 1:58:47 PM PDT by Chemist_Geek ("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson