Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Soul Seeker

How was she treated disrespectfully? Kerry was wrong to use her as an example, sure. That was tacky. But in the view of many people, he was defending Mary. You would have to know Mary's take on the "born that way" issue to know if it was offensive to her or not. Still, he just gave the standard gay activist line. It is based on junk science and that is where the debate should really be right now, instead of discussing Mary. But I do not see it as an attack, nor will the general public, imo. I've been debating with these people for years now. That is a defense in their view, not an attack. And Kerry and Co. have a point when they say that no one was outraged (except me) when Edwards brought up Mary. So what's a liberal to think? In their view, Kerry was defending Mary, albeit for selfish political gain.


116 posted on 10/14/2004 12:43:24 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

Oh? The public won't see this as an attack? Then why is Kerry trying to weasel out of it this morning in his newly issued statement?

He disrespected her by not respecting her right to privacy. He disrespected her by using her as a political tool. He disrespected her by presuming to speak on her behalf.

If you don't understand that, too bad. The majority of Americans heard it loud and clear.


123 posted on 10/14/2004 12:48:28 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson