Isn't this a tax increase?
To: churchillbuff
Deductions for donating cars cost the government $654 million in 2000, according to a study last year by the Government Accountability OfficeDAMMIT! It doesn't cost the government ANYTHING - it's NOT their MONEY!
2 posted on
10/14/2004 12:03:33 PM PDT by
Condor51
(May God have mercy upon my enemies, I won't. -- Gen G. Patton Jr)
To: churchillbuff
I buy cheap cars (under a grand) drive them for a few years and donate them. Since I have such a short commute, and can borrow a car from the company I work for, reliability isn't a huge problem.
I have donated my last 4 cars, and will probably not anymore without the deduction.
3 posted on
10/14/2004 12:03:57 PM PDT by
ctlpdad
(outlaw capitalization.)
To: churchillbuff
4 posted on
10/14/2004 12:04:07 PM PDT by
KJacob
(All polls are equal: Some more equal than others.)
To: churchillbuff
We receive donated cars at our church. We don't sell them. Instead, we find a needy person and then transfer the title to them "as is." The end recipient gets a mostly free car (depending upon how much work it needs) and the donor claims a charatible deduction. The donor has to do his homework on setting a value for the donated car. I wonder whether this tax change will affect this approach?
5 posted on
10/14/2004 12:10:09 PM PDT by
dukeman
To: churchillbuff
Isn't this a tax increase? This is the elimination of a scam. The tax rate remains the same.
Bully! This is the right thing to do.
6 posted on
10/14/2004 12:11:02 PM PDT by
gridlock
(BARKEEP: Why the long face? HORSE: Ha ha, old joke. BARKEEP: Not you, I was talking to JF'n Kerry!)
To: churchillbuff
Isn't this a tax increase? Not if you don't donate vehicles to charity.
7 posted on
10/14/2004 12:11:15 PM PDT by
Prime Choice
(The Leftists think they can tax us into "prosperity" and regulate us into "liberty.")
To: churchillbuff
I've donated two old cars and the charity took the cars away both times without so much as a cursory examination of either. They valued the cars at way above the price I would get on the used car market and when it was said and done the 40% tax rebate I received was more than I would have gotten had I sold the cars without a bit of the hassle. I felt sort of dirty afterwards. It was legal, but it wasn't exactly right, I'm glad they are addressing it.
14 posted on
10/14/2004 12:30:28 PM PDT by
Catphish
To: churchillbuff
My accountant, who can find a way to deduct beer money, laughed when I handed him one of these receipts for a donated car.
He said, "Why don't you just put a note on your return that says 'Please audit'?" was how he put it.
It's a scam. He asked me what I could reasonably sell it for. The answer was about a quarter of what the receipt said, and we went with that number.
15 posted on
10/14/2004 12:35:20 PM PDT by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: churchillbuff
"People who donate for genuine reasons will still donate for genuine reasons." Others, who were just after a tax break, may not.Since when is donating something to charity to receive a tax break NOT a "genuine reason?"
If it is a cause I really believe in, I will donate regardless of the degree of government THEFT, but marginal ones are not going to receive any more benefit from me if I have to go through loads of red tape.
(And yes, I have donated decent vehicles before.)
17 posted on
10/14/2004 2:25:25 PM PDT by
JOAT
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson