From my read of 1163, Kerry was either AWOL or was discharged in a less than honorable manner. (We can only wish he was convicted of a crime and was in jail, but we know better). In either event, it doesn't look good for sKerry.
Now wouldn't that be ironic after all these libs claimed Bush was AWOL that it was really sKerry who was AWOL?
"wouldn't that be ironic after all these libs claimed Bush was AWOL that it was really sKerry who was AWOL?"
No, not ironic - calculated.
Accusing Bush of being AWOL was INSURANCE against the same charge against Kerry. Fortunately, it did not work, due to the fake memo scam.