Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sinclair Draws Fire From Kerry Supporters
NewsMax ^ | AP

Posted on 10/11/2004 12:53:07 PM PDT by Michael Goldsberry

WASHINGTON -- The Democratic Party and 18 senators are objecting to a broadcasting company's plan to air on 62 TV stations a critical documentary about John Kerry's anti-war activities after he returned home from Vietnam three decades ago.

Sinclair Broadcast Group has asked its television stations - many of them in competitive states in the presidential election - to pre-empt regular programming to run some or all of the documentary as part of an hourlong program two weeks before the Nov. 2 election.

The company owns or manages affiliates of major broadcast networks in several states, including Ohio, Florida and Pennsylvania.

Mark Hyman, a vice president of corporate relations for Sinclair, said Monday the show would contain some or all of the 42-minute film as well as a panel discussion of some sort. He said final details had not been worked out.

Called ``Stolen Honor: Wounds That Never Heal,'' the documentary chronicles Kerry's testimony before Congress and links him to activist and actress Jane Fonda. It includes interviews with Vietnam prisoners of war and their wives.

``The documentary is just a part of a special news event that we're putting together. We've invited one person to be a guest. That's Senator John Kerry,'' Hyman said.

The Democratic National Committee planned to file a complaint with the Federal Election Commission contending that Sinclair's airing of the film should be considered an illegal in-kind contribution to President Bush's campaign.

Also, 18 Democratic senators sent a letter to the Federal Communication Commission on Monday asking that it investigate whether Sinclair's plan was an improper use of public airwaves.

``To allow a broadcasting company to air such a blatantly partisan attack in lieu of regular programming, and to classify that attack as 'news programming' as has been suggested, would violate the spirit, and we think the text, of current law and regulation,'' the letter said.

Hyman called the allegation ``absolutely absurd.''

``Would they suggest that our reporting a car bomb in Iraq is an in-kind contribution to the Kerry campaign? Would they suggest that our reporting on job losses is an in-kind contribution to the Kerry campaign?'' he said. ``It's the news. It is what it is. We're reporting the news.''

Carlton Sherwood, a Vietnam veteran and former journalist who made the film, said Monday that he felt the media had not explored the period of Kerry's life after he returned from Vietnam, including when he testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee about atrocities he and other soldiers witnessed.

``For 33 years, we've been saying that how Kerry portrayed us was utterly false. It was purgatory of the worst kind. It was slander,'' Sherwood said. ``But no one wanted to talk about it. Everybody ran for cover.''

Sherwood, based in Harrisburg, Pa., said the film took six weeks to make, and Sinclair contacted him last month upon the film's completion. He said he was told last week of the company's plans to run it.


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 10/11/2004 12:53:08 PM PDT by Michael Goldsberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Leapfrog
``To allow a broadcasting company to air such a blatantly partisan attack in lieu of regular programming, and to classify that attack as 'news programming' as has been suggested, would violate the spirit, and we think the text, of current law and regulation,'' the letter said.

What's good for the goose is good for the gander. We need to show support for Sinclair.

2 posted on 10/11/2004 12:55:37 PM PDT by AZamericonnie (We could certainly slow the aging process down if it had to work its way through Congress. ~Will R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leapfrog
...but they're good with Farenheit 9/11 a week before the elections?

They can dish it out, but they still can't take it!
3 posted on 10/11/2004 12:56:59 PM PDT by hiredhand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hiredhand

sounds like a good place for a email rule with "outrage" "Stolen Honor" and "Kerry" in the body going to File 13.


4 posted on 10/11/2004 12:58:18 PM PDT by WoodstockCat (DNC and John Kerry: Forgers R' Us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Leapfrog

"The Democratic National Committee planned to file a complaint with the Federal Election Commission contending that Sinclair's airing of the film should be considered an illegal in-kind contribution to President Bush's campaign."

But heck, Fahrenheit 911 isn't an in-kind contribution to fnKerry's campaign.


5 posted on 10/11/2004 12:59:00 PM PDT by rj45mis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leapfrog

Do we know who the senators are?


6 posted on 10/11/2004 12:59:29 PM PDT by elephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZamericonnie

The FEC can't make a ruling that fast!! Isn't that what they've been telling Bush about Michael Moore, etc.


7 posted on 10/11/2004 1:00:11 PM PDT by queenkathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Leapfrog

We have Dan Rather to thank for paving the way: "It's not politics; it's news". (Wink, wink)


8 posted on 10/11/2004 1:00:27 PM PDT by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leapfrog
``Would they suggest that our reporting a car bomb in Iraq is an in-kind contribution to the Kerry campaign? Would they suggest that our reporting on job losses is an in-kind contribution to the Kerry campaign?''

That is the best rebuttal I heard of this charge so far. I don't think it's an in-kind contribution because this movie DOES NOT promote George W Bush, nor does it say "Dont vote for Kerry". It just documents a period of his life when he protested the war.

I hope this hellraising about it continues, which I said from day one, because dems trying to shut it down will only drive the ratings this show gets up, and thus more voters will be exposed to the info.

9 posted on 10/11/2004 1:00:40 PM PDT by Greg the Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: queenkathy

Isnt Michael Moore-less going to show his film before the election?


10 posted on 10/11/2004 1:01:02 PM PDT by elephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Leapfrog

WAAAAAA!!!!!


11 posted on 10/11/2004 1:02:13 PM PDT by Apercu ("Rep ipsa loquitor")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elephant

I believe he tried to but it is rated "R" so I think he's doing Pay-per-view


12 posted on 10/11/2004 1:02:15 PM PDT by queenkathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Leapfrog
"The Democratic National Committee planned to file a complaint with the Federal Election Commission contending that Sinclair's airing of the film should be considered an illegal in-kind contribution to President Bush's campaign."

Mebbe they should send George Stephanopolous around to threaten all the networks...

13 posted on 10/11/2004 1:08:35 PM PDT by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leapfrog

The democrats can dish it out but they sure can't take it.

What a bunch of whinners.


14 posted on 10/11/2004 1:09:45 PM PDT by Beckwith (John Kerry, sign the Form 180 - petition at http://www.SignForm180.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hiredhand

Oh, but you must understand - Farenheit 9/11 is the "truth"!


15 posted on 10/11/2004 1:14:40 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Leapfrog

The DUmmies are going bonkers over this. Total frothing frenzy. They know this will hurt kerry big time.


16 posted on 10/11/2004 1:16:31 PM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

and to emphasize how nuts they are about the damage potential about 8/10 threads are about 'Sinclair'.


17 posted on 10/11/2004 1:18:12 PM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
Oh, but you must understand - Farenheit 9/11 is the "truth"!

r-i-g-h-t.... :-)
18 posted on 10/11/2004 1:24:28 PM PDT by hiredhand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AZamericonnie

Personally, I don't think either Farenheit 9/11 or Stolen Honour should be allowed on TV before this election.

Both in their own way are a special form of propaganda and I believe democracy is not well served by either.


19 posted on 10/11/2004 1:31:34 PM PDT by Mac017 (llama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mac017
Maco17, What are you afraid of, h_ll yes put 'em all on TeeVeee let the viewers sort it out for themselves. We are quite capable of recognizing truth and propaganda......
20 posted on 10/11/2004 1:38:20 PM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson