To: Jaysun
Untrue. An example, though not at the federal level, is CostCo. Here in SoCal, they had the City of Cypress eminent domain a church's land so they could build.
Is it liberalism to worry about Fifth Amendment violations in the interest of corporations? Just as the reflexive hatred of conservatism on the Left is irrational, the Pavlovian instinct on some "conservatives" to side with corporations no matter what is also irrational.
To: radicalamericannationalist
Untrue. An example, though not at the federal level, is CostCo. Here in SoCal, they had the City of Cypress eminent domain a church's land so they could build.
Is it liberalism to worry about Fifth Amendment violations in the interest of corporations? Just as the reflexive hatred of conservatism on the Left is irrational, the Pavlovian instinct on some "conservatives" to side with corporations no matter what is also irrational.
First, I was speaking to the comments of the article and that sentence in particular because it sounds like the usual tripe that comes from those that constantly bash capitalism and corporations. Second, the article says nothing about eminent domain. In the example that you provided I would of course agree that it's wrong. I think that eminent domain is commonly abused and should be done away with. However, you blame the corporation and say nothing about the city - without the city's dubious involvement it's impossible for such an incident to occur.
There are some corporations that lack integrity and behave in a criminal manner - but isn't that the same in any other type of arrangement? The corporations that break the law should be punished. Other than that, I think that corporations are wonderful.
97 posted on
10/13/2004 10:46:41 PM PDT by
Jaysun
(SORRY, this tag line is not an instant winner. Please play again.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson