Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar
Thank you for the link.

My guess-timate is that John Kerry did not ask to resign, and there is some probability that he fell into a pool of officers who were roughly and/or loosely contientious objectors, about whom the Navy did not wish to complete a less than Honorable Discharge. The group administratively languished.

When President Carter offered amnesty, the group members who cared to, probably proceeded down some administrative openings and resigned, in order to put it all behind them, receiving Honorable Discharges.

Probably, something like that, is what transpired for John Kerry.

Unless he was "a person of administrative interest," and thus, because of his not-so-stellar post-Vietnam duty performance, he'd gotten himself into "administrative hot water."

President Carter's order, "cool it," ended the matter and probably the Navy was happy to rid itself of the paperwork.

The slim chance that Lt. Kerry was administratively of interest because he did something about which the U.C.M.J. would come into play, is tantalizing for some, but not likely; mostly because, the Navy did not do anything more to him, than the Navy did to the bulk of the group, which was to let them go quietly and on paper, Honorably.

As bumpy as John Kerry's career in the Navy may have been, there is no significant Navy challenge to it, indeed, there is the Navy official stamp of approval on it.

Absent a significant evidentiary find that would satisfy a U.C.M.J. participation, the case is closed.

That does not mean that the participants and witnesses are wrong, though such a conclusion is for what the leftists have produced in the public eye.

96 posted on 10/11/2004 10:53:50 AM PDT by First_Salute (May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: First_Salute
Read the following:

http://www.johnkerry.com/pdf/jkmilservice/Honorable_Discharge_From_Reserve.pdf

It appears to me he was discharge via the reduction in forces or something similar base upon the items. 1., 2., 3. in the above referenced action.
98 posted on 10/11/2004 10:59:48 AM PDT by deport ("Because we believe in human dignity..." [President Bush at the UN])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: First_Salute
My guess-timate is that John Kerry did not ask to resign, and there is some probability that he fell into a pool of officers who were roughly and/or loosely contientious objectors, about whom the Navy did not wish to complete a less than Honorable Discharge. The group administratively languished.

I don't think so. I was a naval officer at the same time and received a similar letter. I resigned my commission in Nov 1972 after spending almost 8 years on active duty and was transferred into the Standby Reserves. I received my Honorable Discharge on Feb 16, 1978, the same date as Kerry who went into the Standby Reserves in 1972. It is part of the administrative process as an officer transitions through the Reserve system. Based on my personal experience, I don't buy any of the less than Honorable Discharge nonsense or a Carter pardon.

105 posted on 10/11/2004 2:39:19 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson