Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: practicalmom
I don't think the focus should be on the end of this money, but on the corrupt origins: Saddam and the U.N.!!!!

That is the essence...what he does with the money after he gets it is secondary. The interconnection and tit-for-tat between Wyatt and recipients could be very interesting.
266 posted on 10/11/2004 8:59:26 AM PDT by hummingbird ("If it wasn't for the insomnia, I could have gotten some sleep!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies ]


To: hummingbird
One thing to remember about multinational oil companies is that they are multinational. Every country has laws effecting these companies and the US has more than most. Environmental, labor, excise (mining) and property laws, shipping and transportation laws are a contradictory patchwork of laws designed to subordinate the interests of the owners of the multinational oil companies' interests to those of the states'. I would argue that the US congress is no more qualified to manage an oil company than they are to manage education. Further, if political groups in the US or elsewhere are willing to be bribed then management of companies should do so when it benefits the interests of their shareholders.

Neither companies or individuals have a moral obligation to support a state who's laws are created to, in large part, advance the political careers of a few well placed individuals and promote the acquisition of wealth by the state or its political parties.

268 posted on 10/11/2004 11:37:47 AM PDT by PretzeLogic (Those who run from the facts only find the truth by accidentally stumbling into it .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson