I can understand that, but I look at it as a matter of priorities. Which is the graver threat: Bigger government spending or terrorism?
I don't like either, but I think that we have to look at first things first.
I am not implying a no-vote for Bush. I will vote for him myself. But as conservatives/libertarians we should be making a concerted effort to promote candiates who advocate limited government.
Hmm. Far greater chance of big government attempting to take your property than some terrorist.