Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ol' Dan Tucker

I disagree.  There are posted rules against all three of the aforementioned activities.  When I pay my fare, I'm agreeing to abide by those rules as is everyone else.  As a conservative, I think these rules should be both abided by and enforced.

 

Owl_Eagle

Well, I just got into town about an hour ago
Took a look around, see which way the wind blow

-John Kerry


 


38 posted on 10/08/2004 10:09:21 AM PDT by End Times Sentinel (I came, I saw, I FReeped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Owl_Eagle

Can we agree that
1. The regulations are just, reasonable and beneficial
2. The woman is not innocent
3. The case is an example of police handling a regulation poorly
4. An officer handling a regulation poorly does not mean that any fault lies in the regulation
5. under-zealous law enforcement is a very sever problem, and the example of an over-zealous officer should not be blown out of proportion to the extent that it forces officers to become under-zealous
6. But the officer should be corrected, in a manner that is not also over-zealous: something that has a definite but temporary effect on him (as opposed to permanently scarring his record.)


66 posted on 10/08/2004 10:30:13 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: Owl_Eagle
When I pay my fare, I'm agreeing to abide by those rules as is everyone else. As a conservative, I think these rules should be both abided by and enforced.

Fair enough.

147 posted on 10/08/2004 2:15:07 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson