Posted on 10/07/2004 10:25:48 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob
Good article. I hope Bush mentions that Kerry's "global test" puts our foreign policy under the control of the only nations that really were the "coerced and the bribed" with regard to Iraq. France, Russia and the U.N. all get a vote in the Kerry Doctrine, and all three were paid like cheap hookers by Saddam Hussein. Heaven help us all if our future is determined by the approval or disapproval of those bastards.
Many rethinking cost of American war
While administrative officials maintain that the ongoing war effort is not bogged down,
observers continue to question whether the American position is viable, especially now that a
main military contigent finds itself in a seemingly hopeless position.
Walled up with his bedraggled forces in Valley Forge, suffering from harsh winter conditions
with supplies dwindling, Gen. Washington is unable to advance, and rumors abound that mutiny
has been discussed among the troops, whose morale has hit an all-time low.
Some critics allege that because of horrendous strategic planning blunders, Washington has
decimated American forces and bears direct responsibility for the current pathetic condition of the
army.
Meanwhile, other voices have called for an investigation into the activities of one of
Washingtons hand-picked generals, Benedict Arnold. Reports by a high administration official on
condition of anonymity strongly suggest that Arnold may have been involved in high treason.
Washingtons troubles continue to escalate. A Philadelphia think tank, the Appeasement
Roundtable, yesterday threw doubts on the administrations reasons for entering into war in the
first place.
While most Americans continue to believe that British measures against colonial interests led to
the current military response, the roundtable says in a new report that Britain actually repealed
nearly all the Townshend duties, those measures American officials cited as reasons for beginning
hostilities.
And while Americans fault the British for aggressive actions at the start of the war, polls show
that few recount that Americans preemptively attacked redcoats with garbage and snowballs
before the so-called Boston Massacre.
Respected Harvard analyst Charles Lee points out that the operation was flawed from the
beginning. The British, he claims, had bent over backwards to meet colonists demands, but
certain administrative officials, for private and philosophical reasons of their own, were set on
independence and simply used the Boston Massacre as an excuse to wage full-scale war.
The term massacre, Lee says, is a gross exaggeration in itself when you consider that the
red coats only killed three people. The British acted in good faith, but we arrogant colonialists
refused to use peaceful means to resolve conflicts.
Lee recounts a series of administrative blunders leading to the current quagmire.
We employed out-of-control mobs, we burned their warships without cause the administration
has tried to paint the burning of the Gaspee as an isolated incident, committed by a few wayward
rogues. But responsibility should follow the chain of command to the top!
The dumping of tea into Boston Harbor, labeled in smug parlance the Boston Tea Party, was a
horrendous insult to the British. Europeans are justified in their anger.
Lee also sees the loss of Canada as a fiasco. Had administration officials worked hard to secure
Quebec in 1775, we might have had a 14th colony and a much stronger force against the British, he
says.
Yale military expert John Andre also believes that incompetence throughout the administration is
blatant.
How could continental officers allow the British to destroy stockpiles of supplies and
ammunition at Concord? What blundering and oafish planning allowed such a misstep? And we
retreated from Long Island because of further miscalculations. And what about John Paul Jones?
He seemed an able naval administrator, but many are beginning to question his competence now
that his prized ship the Bonhomme Richard was allowed to sink. A committee should investigate
all of these debacles immediately.
Andre is most concerned about mounting casualties.
Ninety-three lost at Lexington and Concord, 400 killed near Bunker Hill, 1,500 lost on Long
Island. These are human beings! And killed for what? So Washington can mount the Fort
Ticonderoga cannon on Dorchester Heights and announce that major wartime hostilities are ended?
Now Fort Ticonderoga has been reclaimed by the British, and where is Washington? Holed up,
starving in Valley Forge. It is unquestionably time for new leadership.
Though Washington currently seems to have widespread approval, the question remains, how
long can it last?
Aberdeen American News (June)
LOL!!!! You gotta be kidding me! Kerry actually said that???
If that's true, then that is the line President Bush should be jumping all over in his campaign speeches. Turning Sen. Spitball into a laughinstock would be awesome.
WW II would probably have failed the global test because like Kerry said about Iraq, it depends on the outcome...there were many rough times in that long war. If Lurch had been in charge I don't think its conceivable that he would have kept the troops there to do the job...the "global test" would have forced him to withdraw because people were too worried.
ET phone John, he has a question for you. LOL
I wish I were in your district so I could vote for you.
Well said. So well said, I would like to see the President utter this exact sentence.
Well we wouldn't hear any more of that nonsense about the corruption of the UN, France & Russia if sKerry was elected by golly...
Great article. Who said "Those who do not learn from history, are destined to repeat it."? Kerry is a perfect example of someone who does not know a thing about what history teaches us.
World fails the "America Test" |
Thanks for this info., I am saving it in case I need to refer to it in the future!
That's after Oprah, Jerry, sKerry and Maury are deemed to be no longer the prominent figures influencing the life of most.
I love it, thanks.
THE FIRST PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2004 |
election update!
JOHN KERRY IS UNFIT~THE SERIES
DUELFER REPORT ON IRAQ RENDERS KERRY "A COMPLACENT FOOL" OR "AN UTTER FRAUD"
JOHN KERRY'S IRAQ DELUSIONS~PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE 2- POURQUOI JOHN KERRY EST DANGEREUX POUR L'AMÉRIQUE
WHICH DANGEROUS MAN?
OUR CHILDREN AND THE KERRY PERIL: in Kerry's own words
(a suggested mass E-mailing)
YOO-HOO! SECURITY MOMS:
THE TERRORISTS ARE TARGETING YOUR KIDS!
DEBATE ONE
NO GYP SHEET
Est-ce que je peux?
préemption et l'essai global
KERRY'S "GLOBAL TEST" FOR PREEMPTION:
WHY SECURITY MOMS WILL VOTE FOR BUSH
Diane Sawyer Nails Kerry Peril
PREEMPTION + KERRY'S EX POST FACTO REASONING
WINDSURFER WATERLOO
why the surfboard--not the snowboard--is (to mix war metaphors) Kerry's Achilles' heel
Windsurfing in the Persian Gulf
John "One Position on Iraq" Kerry's 1971 Replay
YOO-HOO DAN RATHER!
KERRY'S BELATED "HONORABLE" DISCHARGE:
Is a less-than-honorable discharge and clinton "pardon" behind Kerry's refusal to sign form 180 to release ALL of his records?
RATHERGATE IS ANOTHER WATERGATE: The Nexus
CARL BERNSTEIN: RATHERGATE MAY BE ANOTHER WATERGATE
CLUELESS: O'REILLY AND PODHORETZ ON RATHERGATE
THE KERRY-RATHER-BARNES FORGERIES DECONSTRUCTED
HEAR THE FIRST VEEP DEBATE NOW! (the whole ball of wax)
CHENEY WARNS AMERICA: THIS ELECTION IS ABOUT OUR SURVIVAL
KERRY-EDWARDS TRIES TO SHUT DOWN DEBATE
KERRY'S VIETNAM FIXATION
PART 1: advice from bill
Kerry's new W offensive
YOO-HOO! UNDECIDEDS + "PERSUADABLES"
HEAR THE SPEECH JOHN KERRY DOESN'T WANT YOU TO HEAR
(WHY INFORMED, RATIONAL DEMOCRATS WILL VOTE FOR BUSH)
DECONSTRUCTING ZELL MILLER
EXPLOITING MAX CLELAND
Kerry is UNFIT #21: THUMBSUCKER SERIES
BOARDHEAD TO THE RESCUE
The Left's Fatally Flawed "Animal Farm" Mentality
(Why America Must NEVER AGAIN Elect a Democrat President)
Kerry is UNFIT #20: THUMBSUCKER SERIES
PREEMPTION-(the whole ball of wax)
CONTEMPLATING KERRY'S "GUT"
A PRESIDENT KERRY MAY BE ABHORRENT
...BUT IS IT EVEN CONSTITUTIONAL?
getting kerry's goat
john kerry lacks presidential temperament
Two Psychologists on Kerry: Dangerous on National Security
YOO-HOO! followthemoney.org. . .
OVER HERE!
"bombastic ass" is not the antidote to "boorish ass"
(or why Keith Olbermann Cannot Do Cleanup for Chris Matthews)
UNFIT #19:
JOHN KERRY'S "MORE SENSITIVE WAR ON TERROR"
THE COMPLEAT JOHN KERRY
WHY JOHN KERRY IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA
Kerry, NOT Bush, paralyzed by 9/11 attacks
Hear Kerry admit he could not think
THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES 3
UNFIT #10: 9/10 mindset
THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES 2
KERRY-DEMOCRAT CONTEMPT FOR NATIONAL SECURITY[annotated]
THE DEMOCRATS-ARE-GONNA-GET-US-KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES1
dox in sox on lummox in box on fox
THE REAL "REAL DEAL"
(what Kerry's commanders and crewmates REALLY think of him--with transcripts)
Did John Kerry pick a running mate or hire a lawyer when he selected John Edwards?
THE MAN FROM HOPE: been there, done that
"Hope is on the way!" (the scoop)
THE TERRORISTS' USEFUL IDIOTS
all the usual suspects
A Vote for Kerry is a Vote for the Terrorists
ELECTION BOTTOM LINE:
TERRORIST SYMPATHIZER or TERRORIST ANNIHILATOR
JOHN KERRY IS UNFIT SERIES: 8/10/04 UPDATE!
taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief
JOHN KERRY IS UNFIT SERIES:
taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief
UNFIT #9-JOHN KERRY: DEADLY OPPORTUNIST
SELF-CONFESSED WAR CRIMlNAL MORPHS INTO SELF-PROMOTER WAR HERO
UNFIT #6: The Deadly Kerry-Hollywood Axis
HOW CAN YOU PUT YOUR CHILDREN'S LIVES IN ITS HANDS?
UNFIT: taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief
#1-making the tough choices in a post-9/11 world
UNFIT: taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief
#2-understanding the job description
UNFIT: taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief
#3-sang-froid and the "nuclear" button
UNFIT: taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief
#4 - Kerry champions tolerance for terrorists
sanitizing evil
Kerry Cabal Censors Nick Berg Decapitation
"Loose Cannon" Kerry's AWOL/PURPLE-HEART FRAUD
pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic
USEFUL IDIOTS
MOORE IS LESS--THE MOVIE
The Cycle of Violence:
NOW WITH HYPERLINKED INSTRUCTION MANUAL
JOHN KERRY'S RECKLESS TET-OFFENSIVE-GAMBIT REPLAY:
the left's jihad against America is killing our troops, aiding + abetting the terrorists and imperiling all Americans
bill clinton, boy "genius," unwittingly bares all on BBC
deconstructing clinton "just because I could"
vetting missus clinton...
The Parallel Universe of Jamie Gorelick
nepotism + tokenism = a nancy pelosi
(or a hillary clinton)
Kerry's Belated Condemnation Focuses on Process
Kerry Lacks Moral Authority to Condemn Content
"CRY BUSH" + Iraqi-Prisoner "Abuse"
What are the Dems up to?
DON'T BELIEVE YOUR LYING EARS (The Perjurer Returns)
(Clinton: Claims I Turned Down Bin Laden are 'Bull')
The Mary Jo White Memo:
Documentation of clintons' and Gorelick's willful, seditious malfeasance
What is the REAL Reason for Gorelick's Wall?
giant sucking sound
KERRY MAKES DUKAKIS LOOK CONSERVATIVE, SMART + JUDICIOUS- Q ERTY6 utter failureBUMP
- Lib Author Regrets Voting (TWICE!) for clinton
"Sickened" by clinton's Failure to Protect America from Terrorism
MUST-READ BOOK FOR DEMOCRATS:
How clintons' Failures Unleashed Global Terror
(Who in his right mind would ever want the clintons back in the Oval Office?)
The Man Who Warned America
(Why a Rapist is Not a Fit President)
UDAY: "The end is near this time I think the Americans are serious, Bush is not like Clinton."
It's right up there with his gaff on the 1st WTC attack; "... the first attack, in 1993 or so, followed by the second attack five, seven years later..." - for an individual who fluidly claims that his (now debunked...) trip to Cambodia was "seared... Seared, into my memory", it's appalling that his memory could not likewise be imprinted with the dates of America's two defining moments of the past decade.
CGVet58
Saddam bluffed and we went ALL IN! Just like the Sons of Liberty, the Founding Fathers -- they went ALL IN!
We have sufficient evidence, I believe, that Chirac, Putin and China [?] were assuring Hussein they would block in the Secutiry Council any attempts at a UN resolution for war in Iraq, thus forcing war.
Without such assurances, Hussein likely would have taken steps to at least appear to comply with US/UN demands. The price of no war in Iraq would be leaving the brutal dictator in place fully sanctioned by his UN cronies.
History will show, IMO, that Jacques and Vlad did the world a good turn by attempting to prop up Hussein for their own selfish concerns.
The Dictator is soon to face justice in a court of law, the UN is further exposed for the corrupt den of snakes it is and a free Iraq will likely usher in a new era in the Middle East.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.