Skip to comments.
The Birth of SpaceShipTwo
Space Daily, UPI ^
| Oct 5, 2004
| Irene Mona Klotz
Posted on 10/07/2004 12:44:26 PM PDT by tricky_k_1972
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
We are go for launch!
To: Frank_Discussion; unibrowshift9b20; KevinDavis; RightWhale; KarlInOhio; El Sordo; SauronOfMordor; ..
2
posted on
10/07/2004 12:45:42 PM PDT
by
tricky_k_1972
(Putting on Tinfoil hat and heading for the bomb shelter.)
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: KevinDavis
4
posted on
10/07/2004 12:47:14 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(We have low inflation and and low unemployment.)
To: tricky_k_1972; Tijeras_Slim; FireTrack; Pukin Dog; citabria; B Knotts; kilowhskey; cyphergirl; ...
5
posted on
10/07/2004 12:49:30 PM PDT
by
Aeronaut
(Sincerity is everything. Once you can fake that, you've got it made. -- George Burns)
To: tricky_k_1972
Space Tourism Faces Safety Regulations (excerpt)
Thursday, October 7, 2004 10:54 AM EDT
The Associated Press
Thrill seekers are plunking down six figures to ride rockets that haven't even been built yet, and a new airline called Virgin Galactic promises to be up and soaring in the next three years. Still, the budding space tourism industry faces a myriad of safety concerns - in the sky and on the ground - that must be resolved before any paying passenger takes off.
The rules that will govern the industry in the United States remain under discussion between federal regulators and rocket developers, and legislation is still before Congress.
The pace of negotiations and the ultimate shape of the regulations could determine whether the sky-high enthusiasm for space tourism - fueled by the historic suborbital flights of SpaceShipOne - grows or wanes, especially among investors.
6
posted on
10/07/2004 12:49:59 PM PDT
by
Wolfie
To: tricky_k_1972
Goodness, I suddenly feel like I'm in the first pages of a Heinlein nove :D
7
posted on
10/07/2004 12:53:24 PM PDT
by
Eepsy
(Today's Read-Aloud: Curious George and the Dump Truck)
To: masher
If somebody told me a year ago that you could do this, I'd have said they were nuts. Welcome to good old fashioned Yankee ingenuity.
By the way if you haven't seen it yet, they have a video up at the Xprize site that is very good. pay special attention to what Burt Rutan has to say. I think he hates NASA and all the other Government sponsored space programs more than a lot of the people on here do.
http://www.xprize.org/
8
posted on
10/07/2004 12:53:56 PM PDT
by
tricky_k_1972
(Putting on Tinfoil hat and heading for the bomb shelter.)
To: Wolfie
The rules that will govern the industry in the United States remain under discussion between federal regulators and rocket developers, and legislation is still before Congress. Let's just keep it in the state of "No Controlling Legal Authority" for a while folks.
9
posted on
10/07/2004 12:55:43 PM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(Truth, Justice and the Texan Way)
To: Poohbah
The perfect way to deliver SpaceShipOne to the Air and Space Museum.
It launches, and makes its landing at Dulles Airport.
How is THAT for a delivery? :o)
10
posted on
10/07/2004 12:57:20 PM PDT
by
hchutch
(I only eat dolphin-safe veal.)
To: tricky_k_1972
almost as a side note, but perhaps a very important one: I am glad to hear that some of the other competitors are still pushing for flight.
I think we have had enough experience with the ((all eggs)one basket) model.
11
posted on
10/07/2004 12:57:22 PM PDT
by
King Prout
(yo! sKerry: "Live by the flip, die by the flop." - Frank_Discussion)
To: hchutch
DHS and the FAA would have a joint hissy-fit.
12
posted on
10/07/2004 1:00:03 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
(If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room.)
To: Wolfie
Leave it to the government to throw a wet blanket on this.
I do expect regulations, but this sounds over the top by description.
Space is once again getting the attention it should, and the poor old government space boys can't stand that they are all but being ignored.
Here's to an end run on something NASA should have done thirty years ago.
13
posted on
10/07/2004 1:01:38 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservatives)
To: King Prout
Exactly, and the way to do that is keep the competition going. The Xprise group has already planed for future prizes and there is yet another group forming for a 50 mil prize for an orbital flight with docking.
14
posted on
10/07/2004 1:02:53 PM PDT
by
tricky_k_1972
(Putting on Tinfoil hat and heading for the bomb shelter.)
To: Poohbah
So, let DHS and FAA have a fit. What're they gonna do, de-certify a plane that will just be sitting in the Annex?
15
posted on
10/07/2004 1:14:48 PM PDT
by
hchutch
(I only eat dolphin-safe veal.)
To: hchutch
So, let DHS and FAA have a fit. What're they gonna do, de-certify a plane that will just be sitting in the Annex?No, they'd probably engage it with a Patriot as it came through re-entry.
16
posted on
10/07/2004 1:15:59 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
(If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room.)
To: Poohbah
Spoilsports. They won't even allow for a spectacular delivery to the Air and Space Museum...
Suppose they filed a flight plan?
17
posted on
10/07/2004 1:17:10 PM PDT
by
hchutch
(I only eat dolphin-safe veal.)
To: tricky_k_1972
Now, we just have to get the big airlines and aerospace companies involved in designing and building spaceplanes. I know it sounds sacreligious, but once Boeing and Lockheed start turning out spaceplanes and Delta and American begin flying them, the prices will come down considerably and there will be a permanent commercial presence, at least in low orbit.
18
posted on
10/07/2004 1:19:08 PM PDT
by
Junior
(FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
To: tricky_k_1972; RightWhale; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; jimkress; discostu; The_Victor; ..
The senate is passing a bill to regulate this, it was a good bill until some last minute revisions were made to it, not it's a bill that could kill the sub-orbital biz, at least in America. The bill is HR 3752, they want to impose the safety of the crew and passengers on equal footing with the safety of the uninvolved public. The bill originally categorized passenger sub-orbital flight with the same liability as sky diving. Please contact your senators and tell them not to pass this. More details about this:
Transterrestrial
19
posted on
10/07/2004 1:19:12 PM PDT
by
Brett66
(Dan Rather, the most busted man in America.)
To: hchutch
Kind of like the RS-71 Blackbird did?
20
posted on
10/07/2004 1:20:22 PM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(freedom is relative. Depends on who you have for a relative.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson