To: traviskicks
This is ridiculous. The administration should immediately lift this stupid quota. We need to draw the best and brightest here to remain competive economically. What a discrace!We have the best and the brightest here already. Its not about that. It's about the cheapest.
Why pay a 35yo (or older) U.S. engineer $55k (or more) a year when you can get his cheaper foreign equivalent. Also when the project is done, you can ship his, differently colored, arse back to wherever he/she came from.
10 posted on
10/06/2004 2:44:54 PM PDT by
FatLoser
To: FatLoser
Why pay a 35yo (or older) U.S. engineer $55k (or more) a year when you can get his cheaper foreign equivalent... Maybe not cheaper. I've met some in IT who migrated here around 6 years ago and at that time they were earning $70K or more a year.
21 posted on
10/06/2004 2:56:32 PM PDT by
mewper
To: FatLoser
Why pay a 35yo (or older) U.S. engineer $55k (or more) a year
The real impact of this trend isn't going to be felt for a few more years.
Why hire recent graduates or entry-level engineers or scientists with a few years' experience when you can get a PhD from Bangalore with 20 years of experience for the same money?
The direct result of downward pressure on salaries and unemployment due to competition from H1B's and offshoring will be less Americans entering these fields.
This will only serve to make corporate demands for increased visa quotas greater.
At some point in the future, there will be no native science and engineering skill in this country, and the ramifications of that are frightening.
To: FatLoser
Also when the project is done, you can ship his, differently colored, arse back to wherever he/she came from. Why would we ship him back?
90 posted on
10/06/2004 10:57:26 PM PDT by
Once-Ler
(Proud Republican. and Neo-Con Bushbot.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson