Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Junior
Where'd you get that from the story?

Dilong's protofeathers are not what we would recognise as feathers today, but are their evolutionary precursors. Rather than having a central shaft and barbs, they are single flexible filaments that would have covered the dinosaur's body like hair.

I have single flexible filaments on the top of my head.

33 posted on 10/06/2004 4:27:38 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Dog Gone

The fuzz on chicks is single-filament -- likely they can tell the difference between the fossilized remains of mammal fur and chick "fuzz."




47 posted on 10/06/2004 6:36:33 PM PDT by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: Dog Gone
Good catch. There are some structural differences between hair and feathers, though, including the anchoring. IIRC from the "fighting dinosaurs" exhibit in 2000, feather attachments actually leave telltale marks on the skeleton.

Hair did develop from the same structure (scales) as feathers, but it developed in a branch of reptiles (not dinosaurs) that led to mammals and flying reptiles (yes, pteranadon had fur -- at least that's what a few Russian fossils indicate).

71 posted on 10/07/2004 3:41:03 AM PDT by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson