Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldGuardChampion

The report fails to explain the logic surrounding Saddam's obstinant refusal to provide the weapons inspectors with documentation proving that he destroyed the chemical/biological stockpiles. There was nothing to gain unless instead of "destroying" them, he simply ... ... buried them.


12 posted on 10/06/2004 5:12:50 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever ("...upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Rutles4Ever

"WASHINGTON (AP) -- The final report of the chief U.S. arms inspector for Iraq was expected to undercut a principal Bush administration rationale for removing Saddam Hussein, that Saddam's Iraqi government had weapons of mass destruction.
"

Time to parse. Rationale was Saddam having WMD. What was it the Poles found? Was the mustard gas WMD? Was the Anthrax WMD? We already found stuff there. Maybe that should come out, finally.

If we find a stockpile, the RATS will change the rules of what a stockpile means.


13 posted on 10/06/2004 5:28:10 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Control the information given to society and you control society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson