[Pearls Before Swine]

Who pays? Do you tax married men--in which case you tax their families including their wives. And who gets the proceeds? No doubt some foolish PC educrats.

And how do you assess the tax? Income? Wealth? Sports events tickets? Beer?

This is funny stuff. I can't believe anyone would propose this and let his name be known.

[avg_freeper]

Wouldn't men then have an entitlement to obtain government mandated access to women?

[Mr. Jeeves]

Just tax married men - that will make the tax easy to avoid. ;)

[fooman]

Hillary! and kerry do not approve of your improper thoughts.

[ApplegateRanch]

And how do you assess the tax

Kr-10/point (adjusted to deduct the female normal level; and for age) on a mandatory annual testosterone level test?

Sounds "fair" as pouffes would score & pay low, while bull-dykes would score high & pay accordingly, as it would be the "evil" testosterone that "CAUSES" male violence to be taxed, rather than simple sexism.

Test would be "free" under their socialized medicine, and the proceeds would naturally go to bureaucrats, who would then disburse it to women's shelters, "anti-violence initiatives", 'domestic violence' police units, schools for 'anti-male violence' education programs, and to grants to "study" and "track" the problem.

Naturally, they would end up spending 150% of what they collect, so raise taxes....

You just have to learn to "think" like a Euroweeweeweinie.