Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07
This is not necessarily a sign of polling bias. Newsweak never weights their samples. They simply call at random and record whoever answers.

After the GOP convention, Republicans were excited. They were more likely to pick up the phone and talk with a pollster, and so Newsweak included many more of them in the post-GOP convention polls. After the debate on Thursday, it was the RATs who were fired up and willing to respond, and this poll reflects that.

This race has moved back into a tie. Fn's debate performance helped shore up his support in his base and won him more undecided voters than Bush did.

This was likely to happen anyway as election day approached. The debate just hurried it along. Neither side is going to get a blow out.

70 posted on 10/02/2004 4:45:36 PM PDT by comebacknewt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: comebacknewt
This is not necessarily a sign of polling bias.

I agree with this statement. I covered it above. However, if no other pollsters pick up a movement away from pubbie self ID, I would say the poll is suspect. We'll see.

74 posted on 10/02/2004 4:50:07 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (Always ask yourself, does this pass the Global Test?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: comebacknewt

Actually Newsweak does weight their sample for party affiliation and "adjusts" the numbers to make sure they conform to "census numbers" and "voter turnout model" which most likely is from 2000 and out of date.


75 posted on 10/02/2004 4:51:49 PM PDT by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson