[Behind Liberal Lines]

How is that any cheaper of a shot than, say, the GOP running clips of Kerry wind surfing in flop-flop directions?

Answer: it isn't.

It's one thing to support a President. It's another to be blind to attacks.

Some of us freepers need to stop pretending that any time something bad happens to our President that "the voters can see through it."

If non-base voters could "see through" Dem crap, Bush would be at 75% in the polls.

[Grig]

"How is that any cheaper of a shot than, say, the GOP running clips of Kerry wind surfing in flop-flop directions? "

Oh come on, do you really someone to spell it out to you?!?

The windsurfing commercial was making a policy point, this is just a cheap shot at Bush's appearance as well as a violation of the debate agreement.

[NYCVirago]

How is that any cheaper of a shot than, say, the GOP running clips of Kerry wind surfing in flop-flop directions? Answer: it isn't.

Wrong. The RATs specifically agreed not to use any footage from the debates, and they've broken that agreement. That sounds pretty cheap to me.