Two brief points, please take note:
1. Kerry: "Saddam didn't attack us...Osama did". Then, why is he so interested in Kim Jong Il? He hasn't attacked us, either!
2. Kerry consistently criticized the president for not being sincere in building a coalition before going into Iraq. But then, he focused on North Korea...and said we should pursue bilateral discussions...and effectively abandon the 5-nation coalition that Bush has built.
Hypocrisy? Inconsistency? I think so.
"Inconsistency? I think so."
Exactly. Kerry came across very confused on what he would actually DO w.r.t Korea, Iran, etc.
He can criticize, but he can't and didn't even come close to offer anything better. That came across very clearly. How can the claim be that he "won" the debate, when he just repeated a bunch of meaningless statements?
He has nothing to offer. His supposedly "smooth" presentation did NOT cover up that fact. Bush nailed him on Korea among other issues.