It certainly is consistent with Senator Kerry's long history of pacifism and attempted dismantling of our armed forces.
If Senator Kerry were elected president, it would be a foreign policy disaster fully on par with the presidencies of Carter and Clinton. Fortunately for us, Senator Kerry is likely to lose this election in a lopsided electoral vote.
That in my opinion was Kerry's weakness showing, he will do away with our nuclear weapons to show we are "sensitive". Then only terrorists will have nuclear weapons!
Quote: Did Kerry just suggest we shut down OUR nuclear programs to be consistent with those we are trying to stop?
It certainly is consistent with Senator Kerry's long history of pacifism and attempted dismantling of our armed forces.
Yeah, I was hoping more people caught that one. Need to get this out to Rush and the Bloggers. Also, Kerry flip-flopped again when he said early that he wouldn't give the UN veto power, then said something later on about passing "the global test".
It looks to me as if W's main strategy was to "give 'em enough rope", letting Kerry hang himself on his own words, and take the high road by not appearing mean in pointing out Kerry's contradictions.
I was channel-hopping, though. What I saw was a snoozer. W avoided getting damaged, and that was it.
I hope you are right.
Kerry is a left wing globalist. I think his liberal views which are childish, might include this crap about being consistent and getting rid of our arms and stopping development of other means for a good defense.