To: Loyal Buckeye
Kerry has added nothing meaningful to the dialogue and blew it on the bilateral talks with NK. I agree. I've known from the moment that NK announced their program what they were up to. They want out from under China's shadow. They want to negotiate only with the U.S. For our future interests, that is against our future interests. China must be involved in the NK talks, and it must be responsible for reining in NK, because nothing we can do in bilateral talks can do that.
2,182 posted on
09/30/2004 7:32:45 PM PDT by
coconutt2000
(NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
To: coconutt2000
Only got to hear the last half hour or so....How can Kerry want only bilateral talks with NK, but insist that we should have had a larger coalition for Iraq? It doesn't seem consistent to me.
2,945 posted on
09/30/2004 8:40:18 PM PDT by
hoosiermama
(Bush Democrats = Zell's Angels)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson