Posted on 09/30/2004 5:57:19 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
Thread 1 - Pre-Debate discussion
The really pleasant surprise: The media had warned us that, because of the rules agreed to by the candidates, this debate would be tame, that it would be nothing but a "joint press conference." The media were clearly wrong, in my opinion.
Depends on the meaning of "facts". Even Brian Williams on MSNBC just said that several NBC producers watched and started fact checking candidate's assertions and he cited examples from both. Surprise! Bush's stood up to sourcing and Kerry's were "creative".
We in this house all thought Bush won but conceded Kerry did well stylistically. I submit that many an American thought by the end--perhaps just subliminally--that they would not care to spend the next four years listening to or looking at Kerry.
I haven't posted in months but felt like chiming in here.
Current AOL poll on who won the debate is 50-50. 72% of respondents said the debate didn't change their vote, though Kerry is winning those who said it did change theur vote 17-10.
People, remember that over the past couple of days, Kerry's pals in the MSM have actually been talking him down - making gun of his fake tan, complaining about his image of inconsistency, etc. They were trying to lower expectations so Kerry would look better almost no matter what happened.
Yes, I got annoyed when I heard Bush pass up chance after chance to absolutely bisect Kerry - the one that annoyed my most was when Kerry went on and on about the troops not having body armor and Bush didn't immediately mention that Kerry had voted against giving it to them - but he was trying to stay "above the fray", so to speak. Look Presidential, don't sink to Kerry's level, you get the idea.
It's been too long since the 2000 debates. Bush was no different here than he was there. People (including family members, which distressed me at the time) said Gore won on points there, and Bush still ended up "winning" them in the long run.
Bush didn't say anything that can be used as ammunition against him in the weeks to come. The same can definitely NOT be said of Kerry. Many people here have already pointed out his idiocy, and I believe he's going to get hammered for it by the Bush campaign between now an 11/2.
.
...There was another Debate in the last couple of days, a Debate Rep. LORETTA SANCEZ ran from as...
..Rep LORETTA SANCHEZ's spouse seeks divorce...
http://www.Freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1230700/posts
.
I wish we could put Rush everywhere.
AT ONCE!
Thank heavens Kerry was so damanged coming in, is my first thought.
I didn't see Mrs. Kerry but I don't doubt what you say is true. She has been looking that way for the past few weeks. I think it started about the time she went to the hospital for her stomach. I would not be suprised to learn she was on tranquilers or drinking a bit or both for that matter. Has she done any major speeechs this week? Maybe they are trying to keep her in the background
the bottom line is Bush lost this one..he appeared unprepared and PO'ed...next one will be better...kerry will get a bounce...
i hope Bush gets more of the moms and housewifes on his side, especially in Ohio...
The questions sucked. Bush missed a couple of opportunities and allowed Kerry to leave some impressions that are just flat wrong. Personally, I don't think Bush was as effective as he normally is but he seemed tired.
Objectively, I don't see a real winner here - not in terms of just this debate. Bush got in some weak licks and Kerry was allowed to get by with saying a couple of things that went unanswered. Two glaring issues are that - 1. We haven't left Afghanistan - we're still there. 2. We didn't get France and Germany's assistance and weren't going to get it because they were trying to hide what they'd been doing in Iraq. The president also gave Kerry room to wiggle off the hook on the matter of 'I voted for it before I voted against it'. Leaving that unanswered when Kerry weasled out was akin to saying - okay that was just a debate tactic, I surrender the point...
Kerry was effective in presenting his message; but, dishonest in his presentation. How that is recieved will depend on how much the public really knows and how much they trust Kerry. And I'm not talking about the Koolaid drinkers.
Overall, Nothing to write home about. Kerry, regardless of the fact that he's a liar, is a strong debator. That he managed to come out of this debate with what is essentially a draw, speaks bad for both of these two.
I will say this, the president seemed tired and still did reasonably well so I don't see this hurting him on it's own. The next one will leave a mark if he let's things slide like he did on this one. And it's probably best that this is done now. In three weeks, it's doubtful it will be remembered. The debate on the economy will be closer to election time and that stands a real chance of hurting. If this plays the way I expect it to. Bush will be on the defensive. He should be on the offensive.
Great synopsis of the pundits reactions! Thank you so much!
Prairie
Hey CTM
Did you see at the end after they shook hands. Teresa was walking back down the steps, going to sit down in her seat. Wsn't this woman checked on protocol and procedure. It was either that or she was happy, happy, happy.
I still think Hillary is behind every move that is made on his behalf. Wonder who encouraged him to get orange and manicured? VHCC VAST HILLARY CLINTON CONSPIRACY thats who.
Yes, this debate was geared toward those who don't usually pay any attention to anything much and it was so plodding,so biased,and Kerry was sooooooooooooo wonkish,that I bet that any people stopped watching very early on; probably when Kerry began his "I WAS IN VIETNAM" comments.
By everyone's immediate lights,supposedly President Bush lost EVERY SINGLE DEBATE IN 2000. But WHO is president now...algore of PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH? This is something the doom&gloom naysayers are completely ignoring.
The best analogy I've heard so far was some guy on PBS who said Kerry looked like the smartest kid in the class and Bush looked like the "seen it all, heard it all" teacher.
I disagree with you--our President was prepared and followed the rules of the debate. He was not slick enough to segue into the upcoming question like "the opponent" did.
If the questions were known to the moderator only, then how did Kerry slip some unknown troubled spot somewhere in Africa in the answer proceeding the question from the moderator?
>>>>FOX panel consensus...Kerry did better than Bush and polls will tighten "slightly." Kristol seemed bummed. Fred seemed unphased, still thinks Bush will win election.<<<<
Yes and Kristol also said that Kerry's convention speech was one of the best poltical speeches he has heard since Reagan.I do not pay attention to him.
Did you go there from a link on FreeRepublic?
We might want to head over to http://www.cnn.com/ and vote for Bush having won the debate. Only 6777 people have voted for him so far (at 11:20pm) compared to 31,000 mind-numbed Cair-y groupies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.