Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic
Where does he say it. That trade and commerce can be used interchangeably is not in dispute. You appear to have argued that those phrases can only be used to refer to encouraging manufactures. That is a strained definition that is not supported by the Federalist Paper that you cite.
629 posted on 10/07/2004 12:24:06 PM PDT by radicalamericannationalist (Kurtz had the right answer but the wrong location.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 628 | View Replies ]


To: radicalamericannationalist
He says it right here. You seem to be asserting that because he said it 40 years after he wrote the clause, this isn't necessarily what he meant at that time, even though he explicitly makes the point that this is exactly the case.
630 posted on 10/07/2004 12:35:56 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 629 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson