Posted on 09/29/2004 10:06:03 PM PDT by Cableguy
From Roll Call, subscription only. Here's the relevant bit:
Looks like the letter had an impact. Although MSNBC did not respond to Brock, a spokeswoman for the network told HOH late Wednesday that the network has decided not to go with Frank for the debate. In fact, MSNBC wont conduct polling at all now, she said.
Brock was delighted to hear the news. It is encouraging that MSNBC responded to criticism in a constructive way. Clearly they realized that employing a partisan pollster does not reflect well on them as a responsible media outlet.
---------------------
From Media Matters:
From: Jeremy Gaines (NBC Universal, MSNBC) Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 6:22 PM To: David Brock Subject: Frank Luntz
David---
I'm writing in response to your letter to Rick Kaplan. We will not be using any focus groups during our debate coverage. We think the audience is fully capable of coming to their own opinions without "scientific" help. A press release indicating that Frank Luntz would be on our air went out in error.
Jeremy Gaines VP, Communications MSNBC
It's funny reading about this flamboyant buffoon, Brock, celebrating like he accomplished something that was already fait accompli. Talk about being insecure....whew. Maybe the boys at the bathhouse haven't been paying enough attention to him lately.
If I was to guess ... Kerry is starting to lose his base
The media seems to be in a full panic mode
The MSM has figured out the obvious. If the polls on Friday show Kerry either holding stteady or losing ground the election is over. They'd rather have no news than the bad news they are expecting.
I miss Dr Bob Arnot too. He was the best war reporter bar none.
That's code for "I might dump Kaplan's baby after the election."
If Chris Matthews is still a rounding error to the O'Reilly Factor on November 2nd, look for Gates to disinvest in MSNBC.
FOFL!!
AGREED.
Sheesh.
By the way, that's an interesting title that I bet Frank wouldn't appreciate. First, Luntz was not "fired". Second, it the title contains an oily innuendo that is patently unfair to Luntz. Just my 2 cents.
Chris Wallace does a good job.
Apparently, David Brock told his buddies at MSNBC to fire Luntz.
Its only because they know what Luntz's focus group will decide. They also know that Frank is not a partisan. He tells it like it is and they just can't take that chance.
considering what is known about Brock I don't know if it was appropriate to talk about being in bed with Luntz.
Here is another website saying he is out:
We are hearing...
that Frank Luntz is being shown the door at MSNBC. Word is that Roll Call will have more on this shortly...developing....
http://www.thenationaldebate.com/blog/
I didn't write it clearly. I am talking about MSNBC being in bed with Brock.
Here's another good flashback:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/883623/posts
I remember watching/listening to this when it was happening. Agree, Bob was the best in Iraq.
You mean I won't have to watch all those ridiculous people that they gathered off the street turn dials and spout foolishness during the debates? this is very good news.
The last time Luntz did a focus group it was the eve of George W. Bush's speech and the crowd went through the roof for Zell Miller's speech and VP Cheney as well. Most of the so-called undecideds were swayed to Bush/Cheney ticket and Luntz said he recorded the highest levels he's ever observed when Zell kept hitting them out of the park and Luntz's meters literally went off the scale. He's not been heard from since.
I think Kerry is seeing the land slide a bit under his feet. If the disappointed communist and enviro-wacko faction sees him as a loser, they may shift to a true love, Nader.
Some recent polls make me wonder if the reason Kerry is down is that some of his support is starting to go to Nader.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.