Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ableChair
Both of you are wrong on two points. First, natural sunlight can't be compared to laser light. Natural light is not coherent, laser light is.

Coherence is mostly irrelevant to absorption.

Secondly, sunlight energy attenuation by the atmosphere is FAR greater than that. What you are talking about is the absorption by the troposphere, and that's 50% of the incident sunlight at that point, not the total. Enormous amounts of energy are absorbed in the thermosphere, long before the light reaches the troposphere. You're also confusing radiative energy with convection. Overall, only 5% of the radiative energy of the sun reaches the Earth's surface, not 50%. 50% of the TOTAL energy reaches the Earth, but all of that energy is not radiative, which is what we're talking about here. Furthermore, the process of diffraction of coherent light versus non-coherent light is a totally different process.

What you are looking for is a plot of atmospheric transmission as a function of wavelength. Any large college library should have it.

Good night.

298 posted on 09/28/2004 11:18:14 PM PDT by AdamSelene235
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson