Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: El Gato

Yes, this is considerably weaker. One of the SDI proposals was to fire lasers from the ground and up to a mirror. That created two paths for attenuation. Some here are saying that energy attenuation is not that big of a deal (the width of the beam was the big consumer for SDI) but I'm not so sure. Do you know the width/radius of the beam used on the aircraft?


282 posted on 09/28/2004 10:51:22 PM PDT by ableChair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies ]


To: ableChair

Do you know the width/radius of the beam used on the aircraft? </i> The "telescope" in the turret is about 1.5 meters in diameter, but the beam is focused onto the target, I don't know how large the beam is at the target. You wouldn't want it too much smaller than that, because that increases your aiming problems.


295 posted on 09/28/2004 11:09:32 PM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson