Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ableChair
Thank you for stating what I already knew. Are you reading my posts? I'm talking about dissipation of energy in the atmosphere. That's the key question here. Usually, power is expressed as power = energy/time, but your algebra is correct.

It's been ages since I've looked at the stuff, and I didn't fully understand it then, but my understanding is that beyond a certain point, air becomes increasingly opaque as more and more energy is pumped through it. A low power beam may be able to pass a certain distance through the air while being attenuated 10%, while a much higher power beam travelling the same distance might be attenuated 90% or even 99%. Because the power level required to blind someone is much smaller than the power level required to destroy metal, I don't think atmospheric attenuation would be anywhere near as major a factor as it would be with SDI.

231 posted on 09/28/2004 10:15:37 PM PDT by supercat (If Kerry becomes President, nothing bad will happen for which he won't have an excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies ]


To: supercat

Until the air ionizes it doesn't make any practical difference.

To ionize the air with laser light it take very large energy densities.


244 posted on 09/28/2004 10:21:32 PM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson