Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ableChair
Oh really? Then why does every scientist that worked on it disagree with you? Why was SDI so difficult to achieve, then? If it's that easy then why weren't you working for them? Now, of course, at point blank range you certainly don't need 10 exp 16 watts which just makes my point. Where is all that energy going? It's dissipating enroute, dumb-a$%.

Driving an X-ray laser, much less an array of X-ray lasers with a nuke, is, well, hard.

Teller's brilliant pebbles idea was better, but one of the best interception techniques is what Moscow is rumored to have, nuke tipped interceptors.

The chemical laser needed to make SDI a reality have only recently matured.

213 posted on 09/28/2004 10:02:55 PM PDT by AdamSelene235
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]


To: AdamSelene235

You're so invested in this hobby that you can't admit you're wrong. Okay, if it's so easy to do TODAY, then why doesn't GWB run down to radio shack and buy all the lasers he needs, throw 'em into orbit on a Delta rocket and scrap the missile to missile interceptor he's building now? Common sense would tell you that the atmosphere plays a HUGE role in dissipating laser energy. It's not hard to see or understand.


218 posted on 09/28/2004 10:06:11 PM PDT by ableChair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson