[Jacvin]

Sorry Rino Boy you're wrong.

You don't have a vote or any impact on how games in the NFL turn out. Your posts on 08 were definitive statements with no qualifiers. Had you qualified your statements about Giuliani they way you did with football we wouldn't even be having this argument.

You are a liar and a dissembler.

[Luis Gonzalez]

Hey...if you have anything to say to me, say it here, and quit it with the macho "I'll kick your butt" FReemails, this ain't Junior High.

It's so easy to take you guys apart!

LOL!

No, I wasn't wrong, and yes, I've made you lose it on this thread.

[Luis Gonzalez]

OK...we'll even parse the words your way:

I believe that the only team with a chance to stop the New England Patriots from winning back-to-back Superbowl titles are the Philadelphia Eagles.

I want the Dallas Cowboys to win.

Same thing, maybe somewhat more to your level of sophistication...

[mrsmith]

You're right on the money.
We have a coalition that requires a candidate who is willing to satisfy all it's members.

Giuliani is presently totally unacceptable to conservatives- but he could move more in their direction. One poster mentioned he could promise to appoint conservative justices. That wouldn't be enough in itself but in the next four years he could, in good faith, make himself acceptable to conservatives in many such ways. It would take an awful lot of work though and I don't see him accomplishing it.

It's much more likely we'll have a conservative candidate who is willing to make himself acceptable to the more liberal wing of the party.

George Allen is one such candidate, but there are others.