Let's begin pointing out your errors:
"You and some other mope attacked me personally because you didn't like my response to the post."
The first post between the two of us was post #136, from you to me, and I asked you to expound on it.
The first "attack" was when you called me "Nostradamus" in post #148, where you began your entire "I'm so much better than you" attitude.
By post #179, you are well underway with your "I know better and anyone who disagrees with me is the enemy of the GOP" crap.
Well, guess what?
If you don't mind, I will continue to exercise MY God-given right as a free man and an American to express my political thoughts freely, regardless of what some heretofore unknown "political consultant" may think!
As far as personal attacks are concerned, you can take your "fool" and your "boy" and shove it straight up your money chute.
You're in here browbeating anyone who wishes to discuss the topic of this thread, and by the way, yes you DID set yourself up as the GOP:
You're not going to change the GOP so why don't you stop fighting us?
81 posted on
09/26/2004 6:19:33 PM EDT by
Jacvin
As an ex New Yorker,I like Rudy, but he is a liberal Republican New Yorker and that won't fly nationally in the Republican party.
And that's the way it should be.
121 posted on
09/26/2004 7:18:13 PM EDT by
Jacvin
Enraged me?
LOL!!
I've debated better on Britney Spears threads, your entire argument has thus far been "you're wrong, and I'm right", and you've spent most of your posts attacking anyone who has an opinion different than yours.
By the way, I have no desire to meet you, why would I, are you going to impress me with your balance sheet?
Yes, I include myself as part of the GOP.
The GOP that is pro-life, pro second amendment, and pro family as stated in the Republican Party Platform.
Why do you keep ignoring the point?
You are out of synch not me. True you have every right to be out of synch but I don't have to change for you.
"The GOP will have to make a decision. It will either write off the next eight years to Hillary/Barack, or run Giuliani against them; he's the only candidate out there with a chance of beating the Clinton/Obama ticket."
You posted the above and I responded in post #136 with the following: "WOW. Talk about a faulty premise."
In your post you draw flat out conclusions based on your opinion which you state as fact.
You then posted #139 which says "So, losing to Hillary would be a better option I guess."
An inflammatory statement designed to insult not discuss.
I answered with:#148 which said "Who are you? Nostradamus?
Your premise is flawed. There is no guarantee Hillary will be the nominee and if she is it is more likely a Conservative candidate could beat her. You can't out left the lefties. If the GOP loses it's social Conservative base it's toast. That's just a fact of life."
My response was accurate. You are saying that anyone that doesn't support Rudy for President wants Hillary to win, which is a bunch of cr#p and an insult to any Freeper worth their salt.
Nostradamus wasn't an insult but just a way to illustrate that you can't possibly predict that Hillary will be the candidate or that any other Republican besides Rudy is destined to lose to Hillary.
You have no idea how to debate.You have debated none of the issues that this thread was about.
Impress you? Want to meet you? You called me a liar. If I ever find out who you are in real life, you can count on us having a little "talk".
You've become boring now Log Cabin Boy so I'm going to end this discussion.
Any time you want to freepmail me and take me up on my offer to "talk" you just let me know.