Replies

"He is fixated on wrecking the GOP and has no interest in dealing with your point."

LOL!!!

More Nostradamus from you?

Here's a clue...it's the "sheeple's" Party, not YOUR party...and this by your own admission. After all, you are the one who said that the Party has no control over who votes in the primaries.

If the "sheeple" want Rudy bad enough, and Rudy wants it equally as badly, look for Rudy to "see the light".

I used that term bacause so many regular general election voters can be swayed by a sound bite.

That anyone would be undecided at this point is beyond belief. Yes, if you are undecided at this point in the process then you have no core convictions and if you can be manipulated by who is put on at what time at the conventions then you are in my opnion "sheeple".

In my opinion a person that can be swayed by the conventions is akin to a sheep.

That in no way refers to primary voters or Freepers for that matter.

I used the term in the context of the convention and I stand by it.

My entire point throughout this whole thread is that National Republican primary voters, not being sheeple, have never chosen a candidate as left as Rudy and probably will not in 08. That is a rational assumption based on history.

The majority of Republican Primary voters describe themselves in polls as Conservative in the fullest sense of the word. Social and fiscal Conservatives.

Anyone that even watches primaries closely can see that as an objective fact backed by historical results and polling in Republican primaries.

You are the one that posits some sort of massive sea change in the Republican base all because Rudy was brave on 9/11 and you think he's grand.

I said before in a previous post that I happen to like Rudy for what he is, the best example of a liberal Northeastern Republican we are going to get.

That does not make him electable as President.

Why do you always ignore everyone's main point and argue at the fringes of the discussion?