[jnarcus]

Yuppers...but I don't like starting way off in 1198 rather than back in 1993...I guess my coment was more towards emphasis..It was a nitpick...Sorry the list is great and very thorough

[christie]

I'd rather have gone back to 1993, but it's darned hard to find stuff still linked on the Internet that dates back that far. My criteria was to have sourced material that was available on the Internet so people could read the full article right then. Only die hard researchers will go to the actual journal.

If you have some, feel free to pass them along.

I also tried to get material from the original sources, and many links are dead or the source is restricted.

I'm still digging and will add more links as I find them.

(You had me worried for a minute when you wrote "starting way of in 1198." I'm sure you meant 1998.)