Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 26 September 2004
Various big media television networks ^ | 26 September 2004 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

Posted on 09/26/2004 5:21:57 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!

The Talk Shows



Sunday, September 26th, 2004

Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:

FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Secretary of State Colin Powell; former Massachusetts Gov. William Weld and former Texas Democratic gubernatorial candidate Garry Mauro, previous debate opponents of Sen. John Kerry and President Bush.

MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Gen. John Abizaid, head of the U.S. Central Command.

FACE THE NATION (CBS): Sens. Edward Kennedy (D-MA), and Lindsey Graham (R-SC).

THIS WEEK (ABC): Secretary of State Colin Powell; former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright; Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-IL); Stuart Stevens, Bush-Cheney media consultant.

LATE EDITION (CNN) : Secretary of State Colin Powell; Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-NE), and Joseph Biden (D-DE); former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger; Albright; Mahdi Obeidi, scientist and creator of Iraq's centrifuge; David Kay, former chief U.S. weapons inspector; Robert Gallucci, former U.N. weapons inspector.

The Chris Matthews Show (Various Channels): Norah O'Donnell, NBC News; Clarence Page, Chicago Tribune; Maria Bartiromo, Wall Street Journal Report, CNBC; and Cokie Roberts, ABC News.

CSPAN: Women Voters in the 2004 Election, featuring Ann Lewis, Chair, Democratic National Committee, Women's Vote Center and Christine Iverson, Press Secretary, Republican National Committee.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: facethenation; foxnewssunday; guests; kerroristcells; lateedition; lineup; meetthepress; napalminthemorning; subliberalmedia; sunday; talkshows; thisweek
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 261-266 next last
To: Lizarde
I thought too the analysis of the origins of liberal democracy as springing from Christian religious wars in the 17th c was paticularly worth repeating at this time.

Hmmm... Not sure which Christian religious wars in the 17th c he was referring to, but I would think that the French and American Revolutions (neither of which had much of a religious component) in the "18th c" were far more seminal in the development of liberal democracy in the West.

That whole "religious wars" seems to be something of a canard. Which wars since, say, 1700 have had a strong religious component? Not many, IMHO.

201 posted on 09/26/2004 9:53:05 AM PDT by macbee ("Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake." - Napoleon Bonaparte)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Flamenco Lady

pinging you with the link shared here :)

Here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1226697/posts.

PADDOCK LAKE -- A man wearing women's clothing and sitting in a parked pickup truck was apprehended Friday on the route for President Bush's motorcade, authorities said.
Police said a spectator hoping to catch a glimpse of the president tipped them off after noticing the man.

Officers found the 57-year-old man was wearing women's clothes and had a loaded gun and knife in his vehicle.

http://www.wisinfo.com/postcrescent/news/archive/local_17966339.shtml


202 posted on 09/26/2004 9:59:34 AM PDT by ArmyBratCutie ("Four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:soap, ballot, jury, ammo in this order!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom

The showed "the look" last night on Fox and I cracked up all over again....I just knew after that sterling moment Gore was a goner! And you've got to admit, the sighing was pure slapstick comedy! What doofus he was! W 2004


203 posted on 09/26/2004 10:03:52 AM PDT by BamaDi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: JustaCowgirl
Mauro on Fox was a snake. You could just see him looking for every opportunity to make the President look like a jerk.

I happened to see this segment and didn't get that impression. He said GWB is likable and stays on message and the only fault (from his perspective) he cited was that GWB won't display "intellectual curiosity" about anything his opponent will raise.

I thought he was pretty nice about GWB in light of that article we read yesterday which certainly did seem to mischaracterize that race. Chris Wallace pointed out GWB led Mauro by 40 points going into that debate (which casts a different light, too, on setting up the whens and wheres) and Mauro chuckled and said "it was actually 35".

204 posted on 09/26/2004 10:05:11 AM PDT by cyncooper (Have I mentioned lately that I despise the media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: maica; MEG33
Questioned the Rumsfeld statement that if the elections can't be held in 100% of country

He didn't happen to mention that is what Allawi said and then Rumsfeld was asked about it, did he??

I guess the media/dem tactic is to completely dismiss Allawi's statements.

205 posted on 09/26/2004 10:06:49 AM PDT by cyncooper (Have I mentioned lately that I despise the media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Republic
President Bush can stand tall

Oh, you just reminded me about something else discussed on Chrissy's show. He wondered if GWB made a mistake in not getting a riser so he'd be equal in height to Kerry.

My husband and I laughed. Can you imagine the riser jokes that would result?! We both agreed that is not GWB's way. He is who he is and isn't going to stand on a riser.

206 posted on 09/26/2004 10:10:03 AM PDT by cyncooper (Have I mentioned lately that I despise the media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
The following is from Robert Novak's column today:

"Former Secretary of State James Baker, the Bush campaign's debate negotiator, agreed to three instead of two debates to get what the White House wanted most: the first debate in Coral Gables, Fla., next Thursday discussing foreign affairs, not domestic affairs as originally scheduled.

Bush aides had hinted they would insist on no more than two debates, but in fact they never felt it was important. Based on their belief that the first debate exerts an inordinate influence on public opinion, they wanted it to deal with the war on terror where George W. Bush is presumed to have an advantage over John Kerry.

Had Bush insisted on canceling the second, town hall-format debate, it might have hurt politically. It is scheduled at Washington University in St. Louis, and Missouri is an important battleground state."

207 posted on 09/26/2004 10:10:04 AM PDT by YaYa123 (@Good Luck To Our Freeper Friends In Florida.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

Wonkette's site is kind of fun in a gossipy way, IMO.


208 posted on 09/26/2004 10:13:14 AM PDT by cyncooper (Have I mentioned lately that I despise the media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Mauro on Fox was a snake. You could just see him looking for every opportunity to make the President look like a jerk.

I happened to see this segment and didn't get that impression.

Maybe your impression is more accurate than mine. I think when I saw his name, I was biased because of that Atlantic Monthly piece that used the debate with Mauro to paint Bush as pretty manipulative.

Also, wasn't Mauro part of that confrontation debacle at Crawford with Cleland/Rassman? Or am I remembering incorrectly?

209 posted on 09/26/2004 10:14:36 AM PDT by JustaCowgirl (Another loyal member of the Pajama Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911
If anyone's predicted the debate winners (not counting acknowledged partisan spinners), I haven't heard it. Mostly the talking heads just list the weaknesses and strengths of each.

But I do have a prediction, only slightly based on wishful thinking. Kerry won't be able to help himself. He'll over gesture, lick his lips, insult the president, make snide, nasty comments, and attempt to look far superior in every way. Kerry's biggest problem won't be his long, run on sentences. His biggest negative will be people seeing him as phoney and arrogant.

President Bush is so comfortable in his own skin, his camera eye contact so solid, he connects to people, people might not like him, but they see him as an honest man, and so steadfast, so loyal, and totally determined to protect America, regardless of polls and focus groups.

I think President Bush will blow Kerry away, and after watching the Gore/Bush debate last night on C-Span, I think Kerry will be very Gore-like...by that I mean a different Kerry at each debate. Bush will be Bush in all 3.

210 posted on 09/26/2004 10:21:25 AM PDT by YaYa123 (@Good Luck To Our Freeper Friends In Florida.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
Agree on every point, YaYa. I just don't think people like Kerry very much.
211 posted on 09/26/2004 10:48:09 AM PDT by EllaMinnow (Dan would RATHER lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: jackbill
Notice that they cut the video off at that point. None of MSM wants to show the next minute or so when Bush picked up a piece of paper that had some scurrilous charge against him. McCain said that he had nothing to do with it and Bush said "Right here at the bottom is says "Paid for by the McCain campaign"".

That is exactly what I said to my husband when we saw this clip. I said they cut off where Bush exposed McCain as putting out a Bush bash and denying it was his campaign so GWB says "Well, it says here 'McCain for President'".

212 posted on 09/26/2004 10:51:24 AM PDT by cyncooper (Have I mentioned lately that I despise the media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
Then Broder writes about a forged document like one lowly slip of paper caused this big uproar when it was in fact SIX forged documents that have been created---that we know of.

I only read the excerpts posted on FR but Broder completely disgraced himself with that "piece" today.

213 posted on 09/26/2004 10:53:22 AM PDT by cyncooper (Have I mentioned lately that I despise the media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
It is certain that the President will have notes at the debate

I read an article somewhere yesterday about the rules for the debates and the candidates are not allowed to bring in notes but can take them. The pencils and pens must be submitted for inspection to the commission beforehand (I don't know what that's all about).

However, your point that GWB will review Kerry's history is well taken.

214 posted on 09/26/2004 10:59:11 AM PDT by cyncooper (Have I mentioned lately that I despise the media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Barset

Wow, thank you. I had no idea anyone read my posts.

Maybe I over-reacted and you are certainly correct. Hitchens calmly said, "Christopher."

Nothing at all rude, there.

However, it annoyed me. I think it all goes back to this woman in my Bible Class who DOES have a hissy fit if anyone calls her by anything other than her full name. She also wears feminist t-shirts to class.

We are all products of our previous existence. Sorry, Mr. Hitchens (I mean Christopher)


215 posted on 09/26/2004 11:10:23 AM PDT by altura (Dan Rather is Geraldo without the humility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

Did I hear correctly. We were in the car and heard a soundbite from Biden (which the ABC announcer referred to as Daschle) that Kerry has given Biden permission to speak for him, Kerry. That Kerry wants Allawi to know that he is totally supported by Kerry. Biden gets permission to make that statement??????????????????


216 posted on 09/26/2004 11:14:23 AM PDT by OldFriend (It's the soldier, not the reporter who has given US freedom of the press)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

Didn't Scarborough get caught shilling for one of his clients without divulging that fact during that segment of his show?


217 posted on 09/26/2004 11:17:13 AM PDT by OldFriend (It's the soldier, not the reporter who has given US freedom of the press)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

It was great when Stephanopoulous said that President Bush has Kerry's votes "down cold," and Cokie said, "That's hard!"

Personally, I like the President when he shows his impatience with rule breakers - that's one of my pet peeves, too.


218 posted on 09/26/2004 11:36:57 AM PDT by hocndoc (Choice is the # 1 killer in the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
I have no doubt that GW will mop the floor with Lurch probably pointing to his tendencies to be on both sides of every issue. I just hope the spin dogs don't try and re-invent what really happens too much to the left.
219 posted on 09/26/2004 12:06:35 PM PDT by rodguy911 ( President Reagan---all the rest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
I missed that one but it wouldn't surprise me, I am always a little suspicious of some of these guys that are overnight media hits. Did they really pay dues to be on the air or do they just happen to be in the right place at the right time?
220 posted on 09/26/2004 12:08:36 PM PDT by rodguy911 ( President Reagan---all the rest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 261-266 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson