Posted on 09/25/2004 4:56:27 PM PDT by MadIvan
Syria's President Bashir al-Asad is in secret negotiations with Iran to secure a safe haven for a group of Iraqi nuclear scientists who were sent to Damascus before last year's war to overthrow Saddam Hussein.
Western intelligence officials believe that President Asad is desperate to get the Iraqi scientists out of his country before their presence prompts America to target Syria as part of the war on terrorism.
The issue of moving the Iraqi scientists to Iran was raised when President Asad made a visit to Teheran in July. Intelligence officials understand that the Iranians have still to respond to the Syrian leader's request.
A group of about 12 middle-ranking Iraqi nuclear technicians and their families were transported to Syria before the collapse of Saddam's regime. The transfer was arranged under a combined operation by Saddam's now defunct Special Security Organisation and Syrian Military Security, which is headed by Arif Shawqat, the Syrian president's brother-in-law.
The Iraqis, who brought with them CDs crammed with research data on Saddam's nuclear programme, were given new identities, including Syrian citizenship papers and falsified birth, education and health certificates. Since then they have been hidden away at a secret Syrian military installation where they have been conducting research on behalf of their hosts.
Growing political concern in Washington about Syria's undeclared weapons of mass destruction programmes, however, has prompted President Asad to reconsider harbouring the Iraqis.
American intelligence officials are concerned that Syria is secretly working on a number of WMD programmes.
They have also uncovered evidence that Damascus has acquired a number of gas centrifuges - probably from North Korea - that can be used to enrich uranium for a nuclear bomb.
Relations between Washington and Damascus have been strained since last year's war in Iraq, with American commanders accusing the Syrians of allowing foreign fighters to cross the border into Iraq, where they carry out terrorist attacks against coalition forces.
"The Syrians are playing a very dangerous game," a senior Western intelligence official told The Sunday Telegraph.
"The Americans already have them in their sights because they are doing next to nothing to stop foreign fighters entering Iraq. If Washington finds concrete evidence that Syria is engaged in an illegal WMD programme then it will quickly find itself targeted as part of the war on terror."
Under the terms of the deal President Asad offered the Iranians, the Iraqi scientists and their families would be transferred to Teheran together with a small amount of essential materials. The Iraqi team would then assist Iranian scientists to develop a nuclear weapon.
Apart from paying the relocation expenses, President Asad also wants the Iranians to agree to share the results of their atomic weapons research with Damascus.
The Syrian offer comes at a time when Iran is under close scrutiny from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) which is investigating claims that Iran is maintaining a secret nuclear bomb programme.
The Iranians, who possess one of the world's largest oil reserves, insist that their nuclear programme is aimed solely at developing nuclear energy. Last week relations between Teheran and the IAEA deteriorated further after the Iranians reneged on a commitment to suspend their nuclear programme.
In a move that will raise suspicions in Washington that Iran is trying to build an atomic bomb, Teheran announced that it was to press ahead with plans to enrich 37 tons of uranium into the gas needed to turn the radioactive element into nuclear fuel. Nuclear experts estimate that when the process is complete the Iranians will have enough enriched uranium for five nuclear bombs.
The IAEA responded by passing a resolution setting a November 25 deadline for Iran to clear up suspicions over its nuclear activities or risk having the issue referred to the United Nations Security Council for possible sanctions. The resolution also demanded that Iran halt all activities related to uranium enrichment, a part of the nuclear fuel cycle that can be used for both energy and weapons purposes.
In a further gesture of defiance, Ali Shamkhani, the Iranian defence minister, announced that the Iranian army has taken delivery of a new "strategic missile".
The missile, unnamed for security reasons, was successfully tested last week, Shamkhani was quoted as saying by state television. It was unclear if the weapon in question was the Shahab-3 medium-range missile, acquired by the Revolutionary Guards in July last year. An improved version was successfully tested in August.
The Shahab-3 is based on a North Korean design and is thought to be capable of carrying a one-ton warhead at least 800 miles, which puts Israel well within its range.
The Iranians yesterday also accused America of "lawless militarism" in Iraq and called Israel the biggest threat to peace in the Middle East. "The attack against Iraq was illegal," Kamal Kharrazi, Iran's foreign minister told the UN General Assembly. He thanked Kofi Annan, the UN secretary-general, for stating the same in a television interview last week.
Ditto
And time for Colin Powell (or Dubya) to give the Israeli Government (military) a 'wink' - and then turn his head away while they do the job. First on Iran's nuke plant - then on all of Syria. A coordinated attack would be fan-tastic.
And I couldn't wait for all the subsequent hand wringing from the UN and Euro-weenies. It'd be sweet and a laugh-a-minute.
Tick, tick, tick....
I think so.
We don't ever get THAT thin with ICBM's.
If we needed to hit Syria, Iran and N. Korea all at the same time, We could. We used to call the program MAD. Mutual assured distruction. Course now, unless the ruskies or the french wanted to shoot back, the Isamfacists don't have enough(yet) to do any good.
I don't put nothin past the French though. We could reach france along with Syria though. They have multiple warheads now.
The Iranians yesterday also accused America of "lawless militarism" in Iraq and called Israel the biggest threat to peace in the Middle East. "The attack against Iraq was illegal," Kamal Kharrazi, Iran's foreign minister told the UN General Assembly. He thanked Kofi Annan, the UN secretary-general, for stating the same in a television interview last week.
>>>
When will the really big jdams be dropped on the UN?
Ol' Bashar should've just given the scientists to us if he didn't want to get targeted.
Flat-head deserves whatever comes his way.
"I don't put nothin past the French though. We could reach france along with Syria though. They have multiple warheads now."
It's amazing we even talk of France possibly being as an enemy. They sure have stuck their arrogant asses out there in the last couple of years. They are going to pay from within from their foolish appeasment policies in the next decade. The writing is on the wall.
Your reply was funny, the visual gave me a nice laugh.
"South Korea, probably - but take Japan? How the hell would they do that?"
Why, it would be all of the broken junk falling on Japan after its ATBM systems shot down all of N. Korea's missiles. ...or maybe the bio-hazards (putrescine, botulinum, etc.) that would fill the air from North Korea afterward.
[Little silliness there on my part.]
When have they been our friend? They even blocked our bombers from just a flyover when we went after Lybia in Reagan's term. I'm 53 and am hard pressed to find any more than just tolerance from France over the years. I'm sure somebody will come up with some key vote or somesuch, but it didn't register with me.
Now they are unabashedly communist sympathizers and America haters. I don't doubt that at some point, we may have to even threaten France with sanctions or something to get them off their high horse.( example, whatif they protect a terrorist and we want him extradited? Already happened with murderers)
Thank you. ...tried to make the humor fit the scenario.
"When have they been our friend? They even blocked our bombers from just a flyover when we went after Lybia in Reagan's term. I'm 53 and am hard pressed to find any more than just tolerance from France over the years."
Good point. Wait until the terrorists hit Paris. Perhaps they will change their minds with their dangerous and stupid games.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
