Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hunble
Neither is an absolute (assuming a closed universe), so there are problems with using either. For a long time, the speed of light was considered the only absolute, but IIRC, a pair of Aussie scientists demonstrated last year that there's been some slowing of light (not quite as much as Setterfield calculates, but there) as well.

Gotta love all the monkey wrenches Relativity throws into our attempts to measure the universe, dont'cha?

68 posted on 09/24/2004 11:15:54 AM PDT by Buggman (Your failure to be informed does not make me a kook.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Buggman
Neither is an absolute (assuming a closed universe), so there are problems with using either. For a long time, the speed of light was considered the only absolute, but IIRC, a pair of Aussie scientists demonstrated last year that there's been some slowing of light (not quite as much as Setterfield calculates, but there) as well.

Nope. By definition, the speed of light in a vacuum is a constant.

72 posted on 09/24/2004 11:19:50 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson