Posted on 09/21/2004 5:11:03 PM PDT by CareyRoberts
When anchorman Dan Rather dropped the bombshell about George Bush’s National Guard service, little did he expect it would trigger a crisis of confidence at CBS News. But once people began to compare Dan Rather’s performance to the antics of former president Richard Nixon, CBS knew it would have to abandon its strategy of plausible deniability.
When people believe that their news is no longer balanced or objective, they begin to look elsewhere. That “elsewhere” has come to be known as the New Media, the thousands of internet sites that have sprung into existence in the past 10 years.
And it was the internet bloggers who hammered away at the obvious forgeries in the fake memos. They tracked down the source of the documents. And it was they who insisted that Rather come clean with an apology.
But Mr. Rather was not the person who did the legwork on the ill-fated 60 Minutes II show. That task fell to producer Mary Mapes. She’s the one who researched the story and obtained the four fake memos.
One would expect a 60 Minutes producer to be highly objective in her work. But recently Mary’s father, Don, appeared on KVI radio in Seattle. When asked about the 60 Minutes brouhaha, Mr. Mapes described his daughter as “a typical liberal. She went into journalism with an ax to grind, and that was to promote radical feminism.” (www.talonnews.com/news/2004/september/0917_cbs_producer_pressure.shtml)
So much for journalistic objectivity.
It’s no secret that the fem-liberal worldview permeates the Old Media. The Sisterhood doesn’t even bother to deny it any more. Here’s Susan Winston, former executive producer of Good Morning America: “We were feminists. We were liberals, and most of us still are.”
The feminist-driven media rigidly cleaves to three rules in its coverage of gender issues:
1. Portray women as deserving virtually limitless rights, with no corresponding responsibilities. 2. Whenever possible, present men as bumbling fools. If they also can be shown to be abusive clods, so much the better. 3. Never depict men as victims or being treated unfairly.
Take articles about missing persons. People don’t normally consider this to be a gender issue.
But a recent Fox News article carried this provocative headline: “Missing Women Grab Headlines, But What About the Men?” (www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_story/0,3566,122398,00.html) The article rattled off the list of women whose disappearances have gripped the nation in recent years, and then posed the question, “But where are all the missing young men?”
Another story at MSNBC raised the same unsettling question (www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5325808). Missing men, especially those who are Black, seemingly don’t rate as much media attention as young, white females.
How can any journalist in good conscience write a story on missing persons, and then spin the article to pander to the only-women-count mindset?
The New York Times is one of the most dependable sources of Ms.-Information. Previous columns have documented how the New York Times has portrayed men in a negative light (http://mensnewsdaily.com/archive/r/roberts/03/roberts062103.htm, biased its coverage of gender health issues (http://mensnewsdaily.com/archive/r/roberts/03/roberts052103.htm), and worked covertly with pro-feminist legislators in the Senate to influence national legislation (http://mensnewsdaily.com/archive/r/roberts/03/roberts052703.htm).
Author Warren Farrell has come up with a novel theory to explain the media’s neglect of men. He calls it the Lace Curtain, which he describes as the tendency of the media to view gender issues only from a female or feminist perspective. His book, Women Can’t Hear What Men Don’t Say, documents the head-numbing experiences of male authors who have hit the estrogen ceiling.
And in his recent book Arrogance, reporter Bernard Goldberg recounts how CBS talk shows routinely invited radical feminists to appear as gender “experts.”
Some people like to dismiss the New Media as a flaky source of news and commentary. Jonathan Klein, former vice president of CBS News, recently derided the internet bloggers as “a guy sitting in his living room in his pajamas writing.”
No doubt the fem-liberal establishment got a chuckle out of that remark. But they need to face up to this sad but obvious conclusion: When it comes to men’s and gender issues, the Old Media’s coverage can no longer be said to be accurate, balanced, and fair.
The New Media has been breaking stories for years (can you say Monica?) it's just that the timing and scope of this scoop happens to be monumental.
Wake up MSM. The outer battlements have been long been breached, and your tower is currently under siege.
And we deserve it! The Old Media still hasn't pursued this story - they only report what we dig up.
The a guys sitting in their living rooms in pajamas are not the ones with egg on their faces. In fact, they were more accurate, objective, and professional than Dan Rather and the highly-paid "professional" staff of CBS.
Right. Never was.
My general comment is that I noticed that this is a vanity only when I went to check the source. Nice work!
They're a bunch of arrogant nitwits. They're feckless boobs without a clue about anything.
They're a bunch of arrogant nitwits. They're feckless boobs without a clue about anything.
Err. I'm stuttering again.
You do good work, Carey, and just in time! Most of the other threads under posts mentioning the Democrat feminist Mapes are full of whining to rescue her! When many of our weaker Republicans stop being led by their tongues, we'll have a much stronger Party.
And all who post/comment here should know that "conservative feminist" is an oxymoron. Everything about feminism has to be supported by funded social engineering programs, or it dies. Those who claim to be "conservative feminists," folks, are lurkers!
Outstanding article !
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.