Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shryke

Probably no harder that hitting with guns. Perhaps easier because they are essentially instantaneous and non-ballistic, so you don't have to lead the target. Devastating with enought power and the right frequencies of light.

**YOW. I'm gettin' all excited!**


13 posted on 09/20/2004 1:40:16 PM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Frank_Discussion
The question is energy density - time on target will be a problem. If the laser beam is powerful enough, then a very brief illumination of the target by the laser will be enough to damage it. Otherwise, the beam will have to be held on target, and that will be non-trivial.
19 posted on 09/20/2004 1:45:49 PM PDT by Chemist_Geek ("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson