Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MindBender26

Rather says unimpeachable


3 posted on 09/18/2004 6:42:01 AM PDT by Vinomori
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Vinomori

Maybe Rather meant that his source was "unimpeachable" because if you tried to impeach his credibility, he may hurt you.


8 posted on 09/18/2004 6:50:04 AM PDT by nuffsenuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Vinomori
May he meant that his source was unimpeachable, in the sense that the guy he got the memos from directly was not a federal official constitutionally subject to impeachment. Yet.
15 posted on 09/18/2004 7:12:45 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Islam: Men defend most violently, not what they know to be true, but what they fear may be false.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Vinomori
>>>Rather says unimpeachable

Dan it rather stupid. And this Burkett character is quoted as saying only two Democrats live in his county, and he's both of them...laughing academy material for sure.
22 posted on 09/18/2004 7:31:53 AM PDT by Keith in Iowa (At CBS - "We don't just report news - we make it - up.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Vinomori
Worth mentioning again and again...

"Rather says [Memogate source] was 'unimpeachable'"

35 posted on 09/18/2004 8:31:42 AM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Vinomori
Rather says unimpeachable

Seems to me there was another unimpeachable democrat from the south-central...Sounds like Burkett is the perfect man for the Dems to start having him escalate from dog-catcher to president

136 posted on 09/19/2004 12:28:18 PM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson