[tcostell]

I'm not a big reader of the AJC, but I have an old friend who has written a conservative (no really) column for them from time to time and I got the impression from her inclusion that they were at least trying to be even handed.

Is this a New York Times style of bias where they at least have an occasional Conservative voice buried in the back pages or is it more like a Reuters style of Bias where they claim that conservative voices don't exist?

[TheBlindPig]

The AJC has a couple of token conservative columnists. But if you look at some of my previous blog posts, you can see the AJC is anything but even handed:

http://blindpig.blogs.com/outside_the_perimeter/2004/07/ajc_distorts_th.html
http://blindpig.blogs.com/outside_the_perimeter/2004/07/its_only_a_fles.html
http://blindpig.blogs.com/outside_the_perimeter/2004/07/its_football_se.html
http://blindpig.blogs.com/outside_the_perimeter/2004/07/bullet_point_jo.html
http://blindpig.blogs.com/outside_the_perimeter/2004/06/hushabombs.html

To name a few.

Their national news coverage at the AJC pretty much toes the New York Times line. Unless the Times runs an article that puts conservatives in a better light - then the AJC ignores it.