If it wasn't for Buckhead, then it would have been another one of us Freepers ten minutes later. And if not him, then another one 20 minutes later.
The documents were such obvious fakes that it was going to be discovered before dawn. Yet, because Pajama Wearing Freepers are, as a rule, smarter than all the big suits at CBS, the Times tries to paint this as a republican conspiracy.
HEY LA TIMES! GET A CLUE! THIS IS A DEMOCRAT CONSPIRACY! GO INVESTIGATE THEM!
One of CBS's own document experts said that if they ran the report that Wednesday, they'd have hundreds of document experts asking the same questions she did on Thursday. Funny how *that* tidbit doesn't make it into the story.
(Wait till they find out that the owner of FR is really a double agent, working both for the CIA and the Mossad. Also, a deep Democrat plant)
This is all they've "got", and I think it's only meant for the weak-minded, slobberingly (?) hate-filled anti-Bush people/voters who are as desperate as CBS is for ANY REASON WHATSOEVER to give the forgeries a pass. Did they think a Democrat would ever take the time to figure out or broadcast the documents were fake? NO WAY, JOSE. They would have sat on them until the Millenium. From their side, the end justifies the means. Period.
The left-wing media always likes to blame the evil conservative instead of getting to the bottom of the actual controversy.
Buckhead, I am proud that you are a FReeper. It's a pleasure that I live in the same Metropolitan area as you do. I am sure you'll be able to wither whatever partisan storm the libs throw at you as do what they do best -- attack the messenger instead of the message.
The LA Slimes, like the rest of the MSM, underestimates FReepers, if it wasn't Buckhead who pointed it out first, it would have been one of thousands of other FReepers with any modicum of common sense. SeeBS wasn't going to get away with passing off forged memos. FReepers are too smart for that.
I'll second that e-motion!!!
I don't really see where they implicate him as the forger, but I do see where they make rather silly leaps as to assert that it's somehow illogical that a conservative would be the one to scrutinize memo's that are designed to be a smear piece against our President.
What do they think that an independant would take such interest in this topic? Or did they assume that some liberal would unearth it?